Yeah I’m in the process of switching my OTP stuff to keepassxc. Better hurry that up.
Yeah I’m in the process of switching my OTP stuff to keepassxc. Better hurry that up.
Hmm, maybe… but I’m certain that everyone commenting in this thread does have a back account.
In places with “hard” water (lots of calcium) you tend to get a calcium plaque in the pan after several years. It will absorb any iron in the water and turn brown.
It’s pretty much a rock growing on the porcelain. A brush won’t move it.
Yeah it’s the common sense stuff we all know to be true. “Save and invest your money! Compound interest magic! Investments increase in value!”
IIRC he makes a case for ripping off his employees. Justification is that if he have them more money they would just waste it, but he will invest it.
So, ah, that’s not how that works.
If he “goes bust” and can’t make repayments the bank will take his cars and silver and gold.
This guy is a great author, and those four words “rich dad, poor dad” are masterfully crafted. The book basically says borrow money to buy houses not boats. It’s not revolutionary, it’s just packaged in a way which is appealing to… poor dads.
Yeah I don’t like auto upgrades. Everyone says it’s fine but that’s not my experience.
My stuff isn’t public facing so I’m not worried about 0-days
I think you mistake how companies work.
When there’s many millions of dollars on the line and you’re an easily replaceable deck hand the SOP is to do whatever the fuck the special consultant tells you to do.
If they could dump it overboard they absolutely would not care whether it continues to burn.
An expert hired by the Taipei, Taiwan-based Wisdom Marine Group “is working diligently to create contingency plans, arrange for a firefighting team, and ensure the necessary equipment is in place,’ the group said in a statement.
Yeah right. They’re frantically trying to figure out how to dump the container overboard and whether the penalties would cost less than losing the boats cargo.
deleted by creator
Let me guess…
Sure mate, I guess the question of whether it’s authoritarian is subjective. Suffice to say rationing would be daft. What about roof top solar?
A very obvious example of post hoc ergo propter hoc. I’ve never heard anyone believe that, certainly not a majority.
What a silly thing to say.
I think you’d be hard pressed to find someone who doesn’t want to use less power.
I suspect what you really mean is that you want to reduce power requirements by some authoritarian policy.
Well how else would they get chopped up by a wind turbine?
Sure ok. This guy drives Australian road trains. Typically 15 axles, 58 tyres.
Last night someone was telling me that the resin they use to make the blades deteriorates over time and covers the area in microplastics. Oh and each turbine needs 40 tonnes of cement which is not carbon neutral.
Yeah I’m generally not a cat person but that’s a pretty rad cat.