The plan is to make it so ineffective it can justifiably be privatized entirely and their friends make millions by jacking up rates on a product that by design and necessity has no direct competitors.

Having all the incriminating evidence on him seems… Extremely unlikely considering the rest of what we know about the situation.

That’s the type of shit you’d expect from desperate police planting evidence. Planting a random suppressor, a supposedly “phantom” 3d printed gun, and a manifesto isn’t exactly hard. Only the gun could possibly be directly traced to the bullets fired, and that’s not something they can test in the field.

Not saying that’s necessarily the case here, but this would not be the first time law enforcement, including the FBI, planted evidence because of outside pressures.

Of course. And you’re lucky if a human even glanced at it before it gets posted so they can be the first to “break” a story or new info.

Pretty sure the 48 hours was about missing people. Generally because it’s hard to keep a person restrained and alive for an extended period, it’s easier to just dispose of them and try to take any ransom demanded anyway.

I’d argue his company’s dramatic increase in denial rates to double the industry average is objective proof that is wrong.

Theoretically. The structure is setup for one, it’s the individuals that fuck it up. As usual.

It’s not the right measure for progress. It’s the right measure for viability. If yield is terrible, the end product may cost too much to market.

People online always want to assume everyone has large families for some reason. Most people don’t have a huge extended family. Only children with small extended families are pretty common.

So they want to hold the Palestinians responsible for the deaths of Americans the Israelis have killed. That sounds about right. America has a pretty long track record of holding others responsible for things their allies have done.

I mean, 15 of the 19 hijackers on Sep 11th were Saudi, so I’m sure Saudi Arabian was held responsible in some form for their citizen’s actions right? The others from the UAE, Egypt, and Lebanon, and all of those places were involved in the response too right? No? Afghanistan you say… And Pakistan was hiding Bin Laden almost spitting distance from their main military training center?

That couldn’t possibly be right.

DNA only helps if he’s already in the system for some reason, like a previous crime. Or I suppose if he’s ever used one of those DNA ancestry things. I bet the police have access to that, whether they’re supposed to or not.

And for a no fly list, they need to know who it is first. If they knew that, we’d probably know as well since they’re clearly trying to cast the net as wide as possible.

Appeals work their way up the court levels. These aren’t the same level of court making different determinations.

The US Supreme Court can’t determine every federal case in the country. And the State Supreme/Appeals court can’t do the same for every state case.

Surprised Boeing hasn’t tried yet either.

Why so defensive? It doesn’t really matter.

Hiding your website link isn’t going to stop someone your lack of humanity has pushed to the point of actually shooting you.

And removing the tiniest bit of visible accountability you give doesn’t seem like a particularly good idea either.

$10 says you and everybody else in this thread didn’t even know this dude existed 2 days ago.

You’re gonna lose that bet. As soon as my mom started working for UHC I knew which evil fuck was the CEO of the worst healthcare insurer in the country. Their own employees refer to it as the Walmart of healthcare, and it’s lived up to that description in every comparison imaginable. I’m not surprised at all that someone decided to take doing something about it into their own hands.

Could say the same about the dead guy. There is a 100% chance that his decisions as CEO to maximize profits over everything else have directly led to people dying that otherwise would not have. Whether you’re willing to admit that or not is up to you.

I would carry out the sentence for some of those fucks just fine. They don’t see us as people, so no reason I should give them the same courtesy.

He’s a merchant of death. Just like a weapons dealer. Possibly even worse, because his company has the power to prevent suffering, and explicitly chooses not to. Morally, I’d say that is worse than selling weapons.

They deny claims at twice the industry average, so clearly they don’t need to, they choose to. There is zero chance he was unaware how many denials his company was sending out, and the only way a rate double his competition could be achieved was by purposely denying things that should be covered.

Extrajudicial killings are of course not good, but I don’t really care about objectively bad people getting what’s coming to them.

His company denies claims at twice the industry average. They MUST be denying valid claims to double the average. They don’t need to deny valid claims to make a profit, only to squeeze as much as possible at the expense of their customers, which is objectively evil in an industry that already skirts morality.

Not only that, but his particular company denies claims at twice the industry average. UHC isn’t in the same category as the rest of the industry, they’re particularly bad.