I can vote for them while criticizing their support for genocide and their generally idiotic political strategy. The other party being worse doesn’t change this.
I can vote for them while criticizing their support for genocide and their generally idiotic political strategy. The other party being worse doesn’t change this.
How would adding who I voted for change my first post?
How? I voted for Harris. It was the democrats who supported genocide and then lost against a clown for the second time.
The “better choice” argument is used by democrats to follow republicans deeper and deeper into the right wing because as long as democrats are slightly less fascist, they’re technically the “better choice”. Now we’re at the point where democrats are full-throatedly supporting genocide. You know, something that literal nazis are known for. Put that in your notes.
They should’ve voted for democrats, who also love genocide. Seriously, the only “leopards ate my face” I see are democrats insisting on supporting genocide and then predictably losing support from voters. These voters were just desperate for any possibility of change, no matter how slim. This is understandable when the change they were hoping for was to not have a president that supported genocide. This doesn’t deserve mockery, no matter how misguided.
A fourth person with severely impaired vision also experienced gains in their sight, but they did not last.
Bharti says it isn’t clear what exactly caused the vision improvements. It’s possible that the transplanted cells themselves proliferated in the recipient’s corneas. But the vision gains could also be due to the removal of scar tissue before the transplant, or the transplant triggering the recipient’s own cells to migrate from other regions of the eye and rejuvenate the cornea.
These parts are a little concerning to me, but I’m still hopeful.
Exactly. He already has his hand up the government’s ass and had been sucking off billions of dollars in subsidies and other benefits. This will only get worse, but apparently boosting musk is bipartisan, the two parties just differ in how much they want to give to him.
I have no confidence in Intel’s long-term prospects.
Break free from the solution they resorted to in the pursuit of profits? Too bad that backfired, but it’s okay since Intel can keep making subpar products as long as the government has their back.
I’m more concerned with the threats from the people in charge of the system, but whatever gets them to the conclusion that it’s a bad idea is fine with me.
The billionaires themselves are pumping up the numbers.
The stat clearly shows billionaires are doing far more consumption. Seems more like you want to blame consumption on someone other than the worst offenders.
Wait until you hear about the NSA. Hell, with all this talk about security threats, there is one stark example of israel planting bombs in pagers, but no one in the west is talking about banning technology coming out of israel.
Now do israel.
Wow, I completely misread that post. Now I’m wondering if I replied to the wrong message or if my brain just completely crapped out.
Are you talking about hamas or israel?
No, that’s on israel that actually does not care about the hostages and intentionally torpedoed all negotiations and even killed some of them themselves.
I know you’re being reflexively downvoted by who hate everything AI, but this is the sort of thing AI should be most useful for, which is finding patterns within large problem spaces with many variables.
Google destroyed that capability for extensions, so you have to use another browser.
Anti-genocide protesters did more than just pick up a phone and call. We all saw the result.