Many things are called “AI models” nowadays (unfortunately due to the hype). I wouldn’t dismiss the tools and methodology yet.
That said, the article (or the researchers) did a disservice to the analysis by not including a link to the report (and code) that outlines the methodology and how the distribution of similarities look. I couldn’t find a link in the article and a quick search didn’t turn up anything.
you should try to ask the same question using xAI / Grok if possible. May also ask ChatGPT about Altman as well
welp, guess you’re right. It’s not common but not just a few someone’s either.
tell me more about the “almost” part …
hm, I think I’ve been doing it wrong then …
someone should make an alternate history tv show where the ship made it. bonus if it’s of a parody kind.
I believe experiments like these should move slower and with more scrutiny. As in more animal testing before moving on to humans, esp. due to the controversies surrounding Neuralink’s last animal experiments.
I think porn generation (image, audio and video) will eventually be very realistic and very easy to make with only a few clicks and some well crafted prompts. Things would just be a whole other level that what Photoshop used to be.
re: your last point, AFAIK, the TLDR bot is also not AI or LLM; it uses more classical NLP methods for summarization.
Is there a database tracking companies that start out with good intentions and then eventually gets bought out or sells out their initial values? I’m wondering what the deciding factors are, and how long it takes for them to turn.
Reminds me of this article https://www.alexmurrell.co.uk/articles/the-age-of-average where the author pulls in different examples of designs and aesthetics converging to some “average”.
I’m feeling conflicted with these trends, on one hand it seems like things are becoming more accessible, while on another, feels like a loss.
This especially may be relevant with generative AI - at least for the very few generative arts I look at, at some point they start to feel the same, impersonal.
yes, you’re right. that’s a bit odd.
not sure why you crossed of “2” there? the formula in the wiki page does have 2 for calcium chloride.
edit 1: but, apparently there does exist calcium monochloride
edit 2: crossed off comment, apparently my app shows the “2” being crossed off, but it’s technically a subscript.
They don’t seem to allow account deletions. Does it mean that this could include accounts that they still keep but people don’t use their services anymore?
suggests either these people are so detached from reality, or they are appealing this to very specific sets of people under the guise of a general appeal
Something like this, unless they know the root cause (I didn’t read the paper so not sure if they do), or something close to it, may still be exploitable.
what are the other alternatives to ENV that are more preferred in terms of security?
yeah I guess maybe the formatting and the verbosity seems a bit annoying? Wonder what the alternatives solution could be to better engage people from mastodon, which is what this bot is trying to address.
edit: just to be clear, I’m not affiliated with the bot or its creator. This is just my observation from multiple posts I see this bot comments on.
I’m curious, why is this bot currently being downvoted for almost every comment it makes?
I’m also curious. A quick search came up with these. Not sure which one is most reliable/updated