Yes, that is totally my point. /s

what in there indicates animosity?

Again, shit jokes are shit.

Everything in the article seems to point to an individual who was too comfortable making a shit joke about a community she had I graduated herself into

Idk, I think it’s probably just a really bad joke from a queer person of color. Doesn’t necessarily means she’s a bigot, just a little off

Exactly. I’m not saying the cops should do it, but you’d think they’d take a moment to pause before harassing literally one of the most famous men in their city. If that doesn’t make them reconsider their actions, just imagine what it’s like for everyone else. Tyreek Hill even made a comment about it in a post-game press conference, where he wondered what would’ve happened to someone else.

Ok. So they force his door open. Great.

Oh wait, it didn’t end there?

Is it shocking? I feel like a lot of kids are angry/hareful

To save the dogs, right? /s

Sorry, did you say something rude? That’s a paddlin slam down on the pavement

I have spent a couple years badmouthing this dude, but the police bodycam footage is pretty crazy. It’s also crazy to me that a bunch of Miami cops would pull over one of the city’s most well-known athletes and nobody was like “gee, maybe we shouldn’t go so hard on this one, he’s famous”

That article is pretty different. It barely touches on the kneejerk reaction from the right, which is the point of OP’s article. It doesn’t get in depth with voters at all, tbh.

If you wanted an article discussing the facts of drug smuggling, yes, your article is short, sweet, and to the point. However, all of that content AND MORE is included in the original, since the point of the original is how people have shifted right on drug policy, despite there being no evidence for Trump’s statements.

I’m a little confused as to how the title makes Trump sound good. Facts are facts.

Instead of downvoting because you think the title makes the article pro-Trump, people should actually read the article

There’s a really good Dick pun to be made as a follow-up joke here, I just can’t think of it

What most people don’t realize is that childhood vaccinations don’t actually last forever. It’s been probably 30 years since I completed most of my vaccinations as a toddler, but when I got my most recent job (at a healthcare provider), they tested me and I needed boosters for some childhood vaccines due to losing immunity.

They’re in our blood and even in our brain?

There are a number of feminist communities on Lemmy that you’re welcome to join, although I doubt you’ll get very far with arguments that were addressed in the 1990s

Yup, thanks. Fixed

Think of noise as a sine wave on a Cartesian plane (the X-y graph you used in math class). The noise goes up and down so that y=1 at the max and y=-1 at the minimum.

What happens if we add 1 when y=-1? Well, now it’s 0. And what happens if we add -1 when y=1? It’s 0 again. That’s basically what noise cancelling does. It adds the “opposite” to make the sound equal 0. That’s super layman’s terms, but I hope it makes sense. It’s basically trying to make the opposite of whatever it hears.

But when something is physically touching your body, your ears can’t absorb that “opposite” sound because the original sound is kind of already absorbed in your body, if that makes sense?

Ha. This guy hasn’t heard of nukes

There’s an alternate timeline where he wins and can’t get anything through because there aren’t enough progressive Dems in the senate.

The other thread was an attempt to gauge feedback on specific ideas (as this post mentions, they are so in the works) and it precipitated this post