I have plenty of folks in my circles who never read or reply to emails :p
Things I’m into: All things IT (also professionally), social and environmental justice/volunteering/activism, cooking, baking, eating, music (listening, singing, string instruments), fantasy books, audiobooks, PC gaming, parenting, Germany, Bavaria, Seattle/Washington, and, ADHD 🥲
I have plenty of folks in my circles who never read or reply to emails :p
“methodological fetishism"
On a lighter note: Hey, no kink shaming, Naomi 😸
The bigger issue for me is the anti-science stance so many are pushing/following now, but whenever one study comes out reinforcing what they already wanted to believe they pounce on it. That’s not how the scientific consensus works and that “methodological fetishism” fed right into it. We still need experts’ help to understand what’s significant.
For science!
I actually like licorice ;)
deleted by creator
There is another recent post about heating things in the microwave creates more microplastics… if it’s in the air I don’t think the microwave ovens are what kills us :p
The air we breathe also has microplastics, apparently … https://beehaw.org/post/8279644
After 30 years of putting plastic in the microwave … I think I’m fine, definitely not worrying about my sperm count ;)
Obviously, it’s good they study this, but apparently the microplastic is already in everything and we don’t really know what it’s doing to humans. Good luck, trying to convince the fossil fuel industry to produce less plastic.
deleted by creator
I mostly eat healthy, but… the munchies 🤷
That’s sad 🥲
You’d think people learned from Theranos or Madoff …
I also encounter this frequently on MacOS…
Some studies need to be replicated before the results are trustworthy and others replicate bad studies - both are issues.
Looking at this graph, I agree that there is an axe to be ground:
Is this theory even falsifiable?