oo1

rtfarchwiki

I’d imagine the same scenario for most of August for the festival too.

how’d they get from 26% in one segment to “almost one third” headline?
Who the fuck buys this drivel for £3,000

Surely if someone is buying research, they dont want to literally buy hype.

skynet

Schroedinger’s polecat

Yep, capitalism is at direct odds with competetive markets almost by definition.
“free” is the non-specific term tht they use rhetorically. “Competition” is the market feature that might theoretically benefit consumers in some circumstances - and they don’t often include that word in their rhetoric.

It’s always been about acquisition of market power, this is sort of opposite of a free market.
If any threat of consumer rights / anti-trust / labour rights or balancing of market power arises, their incentive is to acquire political power and influence to defend their power.

It was the same story in western Europe before industry and “capitalism”, just the landed class monopolising land vs peasantry (and/or enslaved/indentured labour). Landowners monopolised all the votes and even when suffrage expanded it was usually top down. Until maybe 1789 when something else happened to the top.

Unfortunately I think many of the major progressive changes of the past (that benefit people in general rather than the elites - again in “the West”) have mostly followed catastrophic events or political upheaval, or martyrdom.
Peasants revolts, black death, aftermath/stress of major wars, civil war, workers uprisings, race riots, 1929, ww2.

I guess the 1929 and all the FDR stuff and strengthened social policies in western Europe was all widely democratically backed (honourable mention to the banks’ major incompetence , to hitler for being such a massive c*nt and a decent 50-or-so years of European imperial decline) .

So maybe there’s some hope for the democratic or the MLK/Gandhi type approach - not that it worked out too well for those two individuals.

OBGYNU/Linux

“micro soft pp”

i think a lot of people get misled by all the pictures.

The aurora tends to look very grey and washed out to the naked eye.
Unless they’re moving fast enough they’re easily mistaken for thin hazy grey cloud.

Most of the pictures you’ll see are with long exposure settings to get the colours to show much more vivid than they actually appear.

I guess this might be different with these strong aurora - I didn’t look last night but I’m right in a city anyway.

Sandwich is built entirely out of sauce?

People need to stop being such noobs, getting software from repo.
It’s crazy to trust precompiled software force fed to people by evil-big-foss corporations.
Real pros check every line for malware each time there’s an update and compile from source.

That’s how you actually remove edge.
step 1: download bootable linux usb image . . .

“It just works”

gta 1isthe best
goruanga!

I think your argument works if someone is stealing the beef.

If they are buying it then that is directly funding that “90%”.

D-pkg

it’s in a solid state

As i understand it it (somewhere between barely and not at all) the idea is not that It’s “expanding” in the sense of a balloon inflating into the space around it.
Its more stretching internally.

So the distance (or time it would take at constant speed) between any 2 points is geting bigger.
You could maybe also say it’d take more energy to move between the points in a set time.

There’s probably nothing outside, but the distances inside get longer.

It’s probably something to go with gravity, momentum and entropy. The actual concept of “distance” between things might not be what we think.

But all these theories give rise to the concet of large amounts ob unobserved ‘dark’ mattter and evergy, so the actual basis of currently observable fact (i.e. energy / mass) is a small fraction of what is needed for these theories to work.

widdows 2000 was the pinnacle for me, beat XP until i wanted to go to 64 bit.

Apart from having 64-bit, XP was a step back; even if I don’t count the fucking dog thing.
XP was a fair bit harder to de-bloat than win 2000 and they were hell-bent on forcing internet exploder on the world.

XP was also at a time when Linux was becoming pretty easily usable and mac osx was impressive too - I remember using those imac coloured egg things at university in 2000. They were good apart from the mouse, and ran MS office pretty well.
StarOffice was already better than MS-Word at dealing with .doc format across versions.
and ancient version of Wordperfect were miles better for WP anyway (“reveal codes”).

windows XP was already down to gaming, adobe and CAD/other specialist apps, plus maybe MS Excel that just weren’t as good or not available on linux.

Does it also handle key and mouse inputs to make sure they’re interpretted by the right programme in the right context?