It’s still an answer since most people base their vote on emotions and identity, not rational evaluation of policy.
It’s still an answer since most people base their vote on emotions and identity, not rational evaluation of policy.
Thank you for your comments. I feel the same. And I can especially understand that you would tie promotions to at least hybrid. If you’re responsible for other people, need to discuss, brainstorm and instruct, it’s just a necessity to show up in person every now and them.
And c’mon… Being obliged to work hybrid for a promotion… It’s not like that’s a draconian measure at all.
They probably have their identities tied to meat consumption. That’s also a reason for the climate denialism. I recently learned about petro-masculinity and it seems very plausible to me.
Tongue brushing is underrated.
And moreover it was about not deploying nuclear weapons there, which they haven’t. The commenter above has it wrong. The soviet diplomats were no idiots at all. They knew exactly what they negotiated and agreed to and it’s precisely what happened.
That’s why markets need to be regulated in a way that prices account for external effects like human health or environmental damages.
Its true. Even in wars there is a rule of law. Attacking civilians is forbidden. But that thought of sparing non-combattants doesn’t seem to apply in this case in the eyes of some very just people who rightfully codemn a genocide. Dehumanizing as a response to dehumanization… It’s ironic.
Is the data access exclusive for that one company? If not then it’s no miracle they’re opting for a subscription-based model lol
Wait until China has to deal with the fallout of the climate crisis. China is quite vulnerable to climate extremes and because of their demographics they’ll have a huge shortage of people fit for work once the climate damage really starts kicking in.
Thanks, I need to change accounts anyway and I will move to lemm.ee I think :) The policy sounds good to me.