In a commercial situation like a monster truck exhibition, there is president that the operator can be held liable for foreseeable mechanical failure that injures people.
This wasn’t a kid playing with his mom’s gun. It was a commercial production.
Yes, you should that’s like the number one rule of handling actual firearms.
I feel like we are minimizing the fact they were using actual fully functional fire arms on a set which is absolutely not normal.
Edit: Lemmy doesn’t support LaTex
I just want to objectively point out that OPs math is fairly accurate.
What Percentage of Americans Own Guns? 40%, or approximately more than 82,000,000 Americans own guns.
So, approximately 0.0006695% of gun owners experienced a negligent discharge that resulted in death.
If you’re doing a scene where you throw acid on somebody is the person throwing the acid supposed to check to make sure it’s not actually acid before they throw it?
Should they check to make sure the knife they’re about to stab someone with is actually a prop?
I think any reasoning person would say the answer is “yes”. Ultimately you are responsible for your own actions.
Think about it like this, remove the context of this being a movie. Your friend hands you a gun and says it’s not loaded, should you check before firing the gun at someone? Your friend hands you a bucket of “not acid” and tells you to throw it on someone. Do you check that it’s really not acid first?
It seems like the suggestion is that the film set is removing these base line responsibilities for our own actions and I don’t think that’s very reasonable.
Can this do web searches though?
Just like they do on android?
It’s a ton of work to distribute apps on your own and less technical users will always prefer the app store.
Only the really big guys and the really small guys will offer side loading and they won’t pull the apps from the app store in the process.
That being said, it might initially drop apple stock because a lot of people will think the same way you are here.
The books seem to imply clocks or other timekeeping devices but are any specifically mentioned?
Ahh, owning a chicken coop suggested to me you own property. Not many landlords are going to be ok with stuff like that.
Honestly, owning a house/property puts you in a better spot than a lot of people. What state are you in?
It’s interesting to keep in mind the basically no one who worked on that game still works for Bethesda.
With what OS?
I thought that was cloud streaming.
Wtf is “acute autism”? I don’t think it works like that lol.
Suspicious that this article was written by Joseph Cox.
I don’t think so
Ultimately both games involve humans that can be killed with guns so yeah I guess it’s partly that. That’s why I wasn’t allowed to play either a kid haha. At least I think that the characters from Jet Force Gemini are humans?
Unrelated but this just reminded me of how my brother and I somehow convinced our mom it was ok to play Golden Eye as long as we used the paintball mode cheat haha.
I got that part. I was wondering what earned it that rating. I can understand the “teen” rating in the US but this article says that in Japan games rated “Z” can only be sold and displayed to people 18+. Games rated “T” in the US can technically be sold to anyone as far as I know.
So what about the game is considered so offensive in Japan?
True. Iirc it got a “T” rating from the ESRB.
What got Jet Force Gemini that rating? I played it as a kid and don’t remember anything that bad. Some dialogue stuff that went over my head?
Wortbildungsfähigkeit
Not really because these are open source projects. The one that is easier to develop for will likely get more features which leads to more users.
That being said, Java was a questionable choice IMO.