“We” or you?

No “we” don’t, or no you don’t? Seems to me like you just assume everyone is exactly the same kind of bigot as you.

We get it dude you are racist towards anyone that doesn’t live on the same continent as you or whatever.

What the fuck kind of shallow-brained adolescent nonsense is this?

🙄

I dig the keychain buttplug, bold of you to post it here

Well if you can’t see any practical use for it, let’s just shutter the whole industry 🙄

He wasn’t talking about games.

Glad you enjoy playing with your toy though, thanks for the review.

Well that’s a subjective opinion.

The gameplay loop being 10-15 minutes of running around empty buildings and 30-45s of firefights is objectively boring, though.

I’m glad you like it 👍

Battle royale gameplay sucks though. I like competitive games but spending 15 minutes in empty buildings looting, then 4 minutes running from shots that I can’t tell where they’re from, then 30 seconds in a firefight only to die and have to wait for the rest of my teammates to die before I can play again… that’s objectively boring af.

When I get time to spend playing video games, I want to actually play, not spend the whole time just picking up items and guns I never get to use.

have fun with that

Being intentionally ignorant is never a good look.

Yes if there’s one thing I want out of a dating app, it’s being able to give my CC info over to any schlub who wants to spin up an instance

Well if you’re convinced I’m sure everyone will jump on board then!

It would if one of the stones was rolling

That’s… not what he said at all

K

I’ll be waiting patiently for your semantic objection to something inconsequential in one of my sources so that you don’t have a bruised ego 😄

Right on cue, champ!

Honestly if you can’t see how invoking monsters to inspire fear is just a rudimentary employment of psychological warfare, I’m not sure you have any business speaking to psychology as a whole.

You’re completely wrong, but go off sister! Love seeing misplaced confidence and arrogance in an area I’m intimately familiar with.

https://hyperallergic.com/448358/medieval-monsters-terrors-aliens-wonders-morgan-library/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0304418175900123

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-2281.00064

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/transactions-of-the-royal-historical-society/article/abs/games-people-played-drama-and-ritual-as-propaganda-in-medieval-europe/

https://scholarworks.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1065&context=hpt

https://www.jstor.org/stable/175680

Is that enough? Should I keep going?

I’ll be waiting patiently for your semantic objection to something inconsequential in one of my sources so that you don’t have a bruised ego 😄

If I call it a trowel and you call it a spade, they’re not different things.

If mine is made of paper and yours is made of aluminum, they’re still not different things.

Part of the issue is past revolutions didn’t have a ruling class that literally employed the best psychologists that money can buy

They absolutely did, except they weren’t called psychologists and they were much less effective.