As someone de-googing, it’s not too far off in my eyes. Apps depending on GSF is a major hindrance.

My gut says this would kill x86_64 and by extension AMD. My kneejerk reaction is no way this would pass regulators (monopoly).

Yeah but rumble

edit: ok

bold and not

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starshield

except SpaceX is selling for all we know to be military starlink with extra capability to the US goverment.

ReVanced patching will become more common

time to demand apps in other repositories. Bonus if it’s f-droid compatible

Also, ingredients to a recipe aren’t covered under copyright law.

How much is Jack involved? He was the reason Twitter went to shit to begin with.

And to be fair, there’s a lot more terrestrial things that causes GPS interference. I work with a guy that runs a boosted CB radio and it causes havoc with GPS signals. EM geometry is really interesting on how signals get encoded. It was fun studying how CDMA and GPS work.

TrueNAS is switching apps from kubernetes to docker. Might wait till October if wanting to spin up something new. I’ve got to figure out how to migrate my TrueCharts apps or find the equivalent when the time comes to upgrade

I remember my first serious build, blue acrylic case with as much black light reactive components I could get

Just wait, image manipulation will happen at image creation and there will be no “original”. Proving an image is unmanipulated will be a landmark legal precedent and set the standard for being able to introduce photographic evidence. It is already a problem for audio recordings and will be eventually for video.

Well yeah, I’m not concerned with its ease of use nowadays. I’m more concerned with the computer forensics experts not being able to detect a fake for which Photoshop has always been detectable.

It’ll sink in for you when photographic evidence is no longer admissible in court

At this point I don’t want anything to have kernel level access other than the OS and some necessary hardware drivers. I’m not super familiar with MacOS, but do you know if Gatekeeper or XProtect run at ring 0? If they do run at ring 0, would you consider that anticompetitive? I’m almost certain Apple will move or did move to depreciate kernel extensions. Which means it would be the same situation Microsoft wanted to force as you described.

The other argument with Defender is you could at least have a choice to use it or not.

That’s a game I haven’t heard in a long time

The internet is a series of tubes was right there! We were this close to greatness

Doesn’t really matter, it was the EU regulators that ultimately nixed the API approach saying it would be anticompetitive. I mostly blame the EU for why crowd strike could happen in the first place and why there’s kernel level anti cheat.

I never played it, but Diablo was officially ported to the original PlayStation

Everyone that complained about the wintel dominance I always found humorous because their alternative was PowerPC which was developed by Apple IBM and Motorola and fabbed by IBM. Not saying it was or wasn’t better, it just didn’t feel like a better alternative on the surface with it being done up by IBM and Apple.

There were so many architectures and they’ve all fallen off the face of the earth. My favorite search engine when I was a kid ran on 2 DEC alpha servers.