Ah, well, they’re not a psychiatrist so I don’t believe their analysis of the situation.

No shit

So then you agree that people’s self diagnosis are valid, because shitty doctors can diagnose and those are valid.

Here’s a thought for your thinker: your self evaluation only needs to be better than the world worst psychiatrist to be just as valid.

Showing intent is always the start

I hate how few people got it. I thought it was obvious, funny, and topical.

Why do people assume that shit hits the fan quickly?

Trump’s impact will have years if not decades of fallout.

instructions unclear. I now have railroad spikes in my eyes for some reason.

Because the psychiatrist is able to read the text book better than you?

They’re not magic. It’s check boxes.

I etch my data only metal slabs. The longevity is great, but the bits per pound is rough.

Ugh. Yes.

The fact that they have shortening rules already shows it’s too complicated.

They would’ve been better off with a shorter length, and ditching hex for a base 32 string.

Well, yes, for users. But I’m in tech. And it’s the tech people that need to implement it. And when I’m trying to hunt down why something about DNS or a firewall rule isn’t working, I really don’t want to be juggling gigantic alphanumeric strings.

That’s an interesting culture you have. I can’t say I share it.

I’m convinced it hasn’t taken off because they’re too complicated for the human brain to easily reference. Four triplets is simple enough.

It could go to zero and it wouldn’t affect him.

He leveraged his Tesla stock to buy Twitter. If the stock drops below a certain price, the banks will confiscate the stock. If it’s not enough to cover, they’ll confiscate Twitter.

But maybe I’m wrong. I would love to find out either way.

It gives Philippine people the ability to edit the translation directly

The minimum requirement for a page in their wiki should be exactly that. If it’s just AI translation, don’t do it. If it’s a translation that a human then fixed and tweaked to make readable, do it.

I feel like there’s a large subset of people that will just believe anything if it’s said confidently.

“Nvidia lies about future plans in hopes of becoming exempt from tariffs”

Ftfy

U think you’re just pointing out that trademark law doesn’t work the way a reasonable person would assume. I agree, it’s crazy. But if they won, then it was relevant to their trademark (somehow), and failure to bring relevant cases can lead to losing it.

So yes, it’s weird and sketchy and feels morally wrong. But also yes, it’s required and expected legally.

If they had no case they lost. If they have a case, they win.

It’s a truism.

Then they had a case