![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/170721ad-9010-470f-a4a4-ead95f51f13b.png)
This is what it is called a programming language, it only exists to be able to tell the machine what to do in an unambiguous (in contrast to natural language) way.
This is what it is called a programming language, it only exists to be able to tell the machine what to do in an unambiguous (in contrast to natural language) way.
Thanks, the article was accessible for me so I thought it would be also for others.
Not really https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/01/technology/kaspersky-lab-antivirus.html
Very creative how Kaspersky used SEO to hide this story. When searching you have to exclude all of their sites to find it.
To be fair, he provided instructions.
We should never have allowed a pardon before a conviction. What Ford did for Nixon created all kinds of paradoxes.
We messed up when we allowed Ford’s pardon of Nixon before he was convicted. We should only allow pardons after the person was convicted. That created all kinds of paradoxes:
He was going to face a trial and likely prison, but trump pardoned him and the rest.
For writing an application GPL is fine if you don’t want anyone to profit from your work and if they make changes, contribute back.
Things are a little bit more complex if you are writing a library or code that is meant to be included in another application.
If you use GPL you might get rejected even by other open source applications, as GPL might be understandable as it will change license off the application or be outright incompatible.
This was the case with cursor library after author changed license everyone stopped using it: https://github.com/GijsTimmers/cursor/commit/885156333ac9ca335a587b1dd08964074313f026
The most ironic thing is that he created package from stack overflow answer:
https://github.com/GijsTimmers/cursor/blob/master/cursor/cursor.py
The original author never said they are releasing copyright or are making it public domain.
Greed is preventing them. Our news are no longer news, those are entertainment stations looking for spectacle and trump provides plenty of it.
If our news would just report news, this actually l act wouldn’t be an issue.
I would encourage to subscribe and support real news sources that do actual real news reporting like AP, Reuters, NPR etc.
Sure, but my point is that if it is implemented right, you won’t even know you’re using IPv6 until you check network configuration.
It’s actually more of the same in this case as well, this position was just easier to defend.
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE FELONS?
If IPv6 is done right you don’t even know you have it. If you use a cell phone or a home Internet, there is a high chance you are already using IPv6.
House arrest is not a penalty that would help him rehabilitate.
He needs an actual jail to learn anything.
At very least he should be doing community service. Maybe picking trash on a highway.
Judges can’t put you in jail if DA doesn’t bring charges and a jury won’t convict.
Canon is trying to do the reverse, using anything she has at her disposal for the trial to not happen as she knows that this case is pretty much an open shut case.
That’s why we have a trial by jury of peers.
An executive branch can issue a pardon, legislative branch can create a law making the crime no longer being a crime and impeach judges.
If those things are not enough, then we have a much more serious problem.
Can I remind you that trump declared he is running again after federal investigation started? This is why special counsel was appointed.
This particular case actually started when trump was still president. Cohen is a convicted felon that already served 3 years, because he helped trump commit this exact crime. Trump wasn’t indicted back then only because he was president at the time.
It’s not like she is already against prosecution. I don’t believe it could be any more partisan than it already is.
As for delay her last ruling essentially made it indefinite.
As you said, this would require an additional action.
And to me it looks like it can’t be done by EO and would have to be a legislation. And during trump very few legislations got passed even when they had a majority.
The restrictions on sale through Mexico can be implemented when it actually is a problem.
I found an article where they announced a factory in Mexico, but it first have to be built. The news also appears to be before the sanctions were announced. So if that factory was meant for US market this could change their plans, as adding 100% sanctions signals determination to plugin other loopholes.
From my experience all the time (probably even more) it saves me is wasted on spotting bugs and the bugs are in very subtle places.