Why do you quote Google? Wouldn’t a more reputable source be more appropriate?
Why do you quote Google? Wouldn’t a more reputable source be more appropriate?
Are they telling their clients to get out of the housing market? That’s when things change.
Somebody has to pay for falling housing prices. Should that be negotiated or should it be a game of hot potato?
Better remove it.
Why would he not pay somebody to play?
The bigger story is:
Who are those 343,011 idiots?
Make red, blue and white the new LGBT colors. Things will get funny.
Yes, let AI execute all business processes as designed.
Reposting my question from the other post:
Can lemmy become the place on the internet to discover the best accounts on X and thus become popular?
When lemmy becomes popular, how will we make the solid information stand out and not drown in disinformation ourselves?
Can we pull off an elite move and use the war to make lemmy popular right now by being the place on the internet that has the best collection of relevant and trustworthy X accounts?
We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness
I wonder if that was applied to everybody.
That doesn’t sound crass enough to grasp the full extend of the development. AI will take all of the energy. E v e r y t h I n g.
There won’t be a planet once there is a Dyson sphere. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere
The numbers of comments is growing. I would take that as the reliable engagement metric. The falling number of active users could be a sign of people settling on a main account.
Why? If they don’t employ other drivers and every driver is a member, everything should be fine.
They obviously lack a role model in their life. If there is a market for such an app, who has or is going to develop an app that fills that gap and offers the knowledge sincerely that they are missing, without the abusive parts?
It’s not a matter of responsibility.
The rich and powerful won’t safe the world. If we don’t want to live in a world with so many natural desasters that there is no farming and only synthetic food, then things have to change.
The opposite of the rich and powerful are not the weak and vulnerable but almost everybody. It’s OK to let things happen but it’s also possible to change everything, maybe even in a week or two.
That’s because they are still trapped in New Jersey.