He is making a great effort at it though.
He is making a great effort at it though.
Why is this posted in Technology? I want to read about cool tech, not some stupid guy’s sex life.
Isn’t that the discussion though? Take the time and money spent on this to fight someone more deserving.
I never watch linked videos but this one was worth it.
Either he called 911 reporting events that did not happen or he reported others’ 911 calls as false.
I switched to Linux on my laptop full time ~6 months ago. If had to reinstall my OS a few times since to fix issues, but pop_os (what I am using) has a nice feature that keeps the home folder. All my data is preserved and OS is refreshed (Windows has this as well)
Didn’t think about that. Thanks
The game also requires a renderer (browser) to play.
I think what they did is impressive but the claim about the size feels like taking source code and saying “look how small on disk it is”
It is so good that when I use Google on someone else’s computer, I’m surprised at how bad Google has become.
Honest question, why would it cost money?
I (almost) only use LaTeX now, I find it easier than having to manually set headings etc. I find it great even for just one page notes.
The few times I do not use it is when I have to colab on a document with someone else.
splash that appears when I open it with an empty buffer, and following its instructions.
That’s the key to the problem, I have almost never open vim with an empty buffer, almost only used it to open files directly. Since there is no nice splash screen telling you how to exit when you use vi <your_file>
, this meme happens.
LaTeX, code and compile your documents instead of fighting with word.
My updates did the opposite:
Just look at all the people getting frustrated at being told “you should probably do it a different way.” They really don’t understand that just because they’re asking the question, it’s not all about them.
I don’t agree. I remember having a problem (something with PDF and JS if I remember correctly) and I had some restrictions (no I could not do anything about those restrictions). Someone on SO had asked my question with somewhat the same restrictions, which boiled downed to no being able to utilize the most common solution. The first answer on SO was to use the solution that specifically could not be used.
I can see your point and I actually somewhat agree but when the answers are “do X” to the question “how do I do this when I cannot do X?”, the audience should be the minority going there because they have a niece problem, not the majority that are lead there by search engines. And all the “do X” answers should be removed, or moved somewhere they are relevant.
Just comment or comment with post?
I read the article and I read the comments. Is there something I am missing here? I thought they were discussing OpenAI gathering data on it’s users (those using ChatGPT) and not giving that data back. Based on the comments, the article is upset that OpenAI can give back data that ChatGPT was trained on.
Does the second case fall under GDPR? Could not OpenAI just claim that they removed any information that makes it identifiable and call is a day?
Perhaps because a court hasn’t ruled on it, they won’t word it that explicitly?
My best guess is that the new paper could be charged with defamation if the court ruled that the police didn’t kill him and they claimed he did.
But I’m not a lawyer and have no idea about the law regarding journalism nor its ethics.
How did you do that? My laptop is at 14gb now and I am not using it (typing on phone)
Since no one is explaining and I have only ever heard of Rabbit on Lemmy (again with no context, probably a US thing), here is a Kagi quick answer: