India, the country best known for being notoriously corrupt to the point where it’s very noticeably hindering progress?
India, the country best known for being notoriously corrupt to the point where it’s very noticeably hindering progress?
Ads are a core component of how search makes money. They’re also a core component of how YouTube makes money.
Ranked higher than a country where many believe there to only be one valid party and that if the other party gains power that the entire democratic system will collapse and bring Armageddon?
That’s who you’re comparing against?
It’s also just often completely inaccurate. The standards it uses to cite works make them pretty much useless: any good information on Wikipedia is on there by accident.
Usually people would consider within a few degrees (1? 2? Certainly less than 5) to be an acceptable margin, but the pole itself is a well-defined point along the axis of rotation.
This is what happens when your incentive structure doesn’t reward actual proper journalism.
Might as well have quoted my own asshole
American media is legitimately just extremely unreliable. British, Chinese, Russian, French, German, Middle Eastern, and Southeast Asian sources all got the detail that the recent Indian moon mission landed near the South Pole, but most American media picked up that they had somehow landed on the South Pole and put that in their titles.
They were 21 degrees of latitude off, for reference.
Satellites have some degree of mobility and space junk follows trajectories that can be computed basically infinitely into the future.
Space junk is highly deterministic, though. No atmosphere to fuck with.
It absolutely is, even if your particular instance hasn’t been. Lemmy.world probably takes the brunt of it.
Does that claim remove the existence of conflict of interest?
State funding describes a conflict of interest, whether perceived or actual.
Musk wasn’t wrong in applying the state media tag to NPR/BBC/CBC. At the end of the day, they are funded by the state.
Thanks, China.
The entire point of E2EE is that it doesn’t matter who the host is.
Would that change anything? Russia is a tiny economy even in the European context. You’re saying Europe couldn’t maintain It’s territorial sovereignty without the US in NATO?
Ah yes, because all of NATO Europe (GDP: $23 trillion) and Canada (GDP: $2 trillion) could never match the economic might of Russia (GDP: $1.8 trillion) and needs US support in any protracted conflict.
Who do you think you’re convincing?
Did you actually watch the videos, or do you just look at the title and make your conclusion? Here’s some more:
https://youtu.be/zt7afB22S1U?si=JcN7vZrswgtLS69G
https://youtu.be/Ug2Eeflo5ao?si=5J9HwdLwOJuRctQS
https://youtu.be/CTU0FNo5HE8?si=0q1vp_t3SEzd4OUQ
And here’s some more pro-Japan/Korea content:
https://youtu.be/T30C3-K-PmA?si=KgioEIEVDli5SCqi
https://youtu.be/VucIYdBvsCM?si=l8xbHPOWBblQi0CP
What exactly is this viscerally anti-Japan/Korea government content you speak of?
Have you looked at what’s considered a valid “source” on Wikipedia?
The fact that there’s an odd good article does not make the site a reliable source of anything.