No, no, no, you must respond with a Wikipedia article.
Also, the first article that you responded to has multiple times when Microsoft did this and you should go actually read it. Don’t need the specific example that you think acts like a counterpoint to think giant tech corps are assholes and will act like it.
But where would it send the GPS data if not over Bluetooth?
All the screen area of a phone with all the durability issues of a foldable.
We already know Trump runs away from fighting as fast as his bone spurs can carry him.
Haven’t read any of those for a while, but I guess they wouldn’t be worse in vim.
Yep, going through the first part of the ff7 remake and the combat is a puzzle. Don’t do it right and get your ass kicked. MMO combat is the same: stack or die/spread or die, memories this dance, etc.
PH pulled out of those states due to age verification legislation.
Ah, the post title changed. It was poorly worded and could be read like that.
Wasn’t sure if directly linking pornhub was acceptable here or not. Thank you for doing so.
Shooting a dead food service worker if the headline is to be believed.
Article has a link to the actual report. Surprisingly California is below average in consumption while South Carolina is furiously trying to make up for it and then some.
Don’t blame us. Blame yourself or God.
Ah, typically it’s DMs that alter mechanics and approve homebrew. If I were running a campaign, and I had a player saying “I want to change the rules so you have to run the game a certain way,” it would be a huge red flag.
If a player wants to play in a certain way, it’s not usually the mechanics that prevents them. Your example where you picked a ranger that didn’t fit what was going on in the campaign, that seems like a failure of communication. The DM allowed you to think wearing a snorkel in the desert was a good idea. I don’t think having a class with snorkel AND fins would have helped in the desert and I don’t think the fins would have forced the DM to put a river in to suit the diver class. I don’t think it’s unreasonable or unpleasant for the DM to say: this is a dessert campaign, you’re not going to want a 60 pound tank on your back for this even though it’s very helpful in a situation where you’re trying not to drown.
I don’t think restricting what can be done or changing mechanics would make that DM any better or make communication any less necessary or force the DM to make changes to the campaign.
Again, it’s best when collaborative and avoiding unpleasant conversations leads to just as many problems in d&d as it does in any relationship. Rules aren’t going to help if there’s not communication.
The mechanics in d&d are mostly about combat and skill checks because as a player you get to decide how you behave and the mechanics are there to have a framework for that. If players aren’t acting like you want them to as a DM and you feel like it’s a good idea to enforce your desires through changing the mechanics, you’re going to disappoint yourself and frustrate your players. If you want a certain style of role playing, that’s something you can discuss with players, but it’s ultimately collaborative as opposed to enforceable.
Maybe they also make delicate plates?
Along with solar panels, yes.
Since the thread is on a topic of white supremacy in the US, I thought it might be interesting to share a little about how we tainted calling a spade a spade. We do that with a lot of things and have extra baggage on a lot of topics that other places might not.
deleted by creator
I’m pretty sure that one is about Schrek.