• conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Epic can’t make a dent because their product is dogshit.

    Customers don’t care that Valve takes a well earned cut (that only applies buying directly from Steam); they care that their games are on a platform that’s actually fucking useful. If Epic didn’t insult gamers shipping that piece of trash and had put work into actually providing a product that could possibly be considered acceptable, they might have been able to make a dent.

    You’re not going to take market share with shitty gimmicks if your actual product is a crime against humanity no one wants.

    • ninchuka@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      yeah epic might have a chance if they actually tried to make their launcher and client good and have similar features as steam

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          The cut, genius. The cut you said is “well earned.” That is what’s horseshit, here.

          And on consoles.

          And on phones.

          • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            And every one of them comes back because paying Steam 30% is by far the most profitable way to do business. They absolutely deserve every single penny of it.

            30% commission on an all margin product is not even sort of unusual or unfair.

                • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Then developers can release games off steam, and some do.

                  But steam has many features people want and use that would add development costs if every dev had to make similar tools in house.

                  Think SteamVR, Steam Controller, workshop, community forums, steam achievements, steam overlay, friends, etc …

                  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    ‘This thing should be slightly different.’

                    ‘Then use something else entirely!’

                    Some of y’all really do not know how criticism works.

            • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              “It makes money so it can’t be wrong.”

              “It’s commonplace so it must be fine.”

              Y’all have no idea what criticism even looks like.

              • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                The fact that using their services and paying them their cut is more profitable than not doing so absolutely, in and of itself, proves beyond discussion that their cut is fair.

                Yes, sales should cost money. Moving units is a fucking massive value add. Valve deserves every penny they take and more. They’re the best thing that ever happened to PC gaming and nothing else is remotely close.

                • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Beyond discussion! What a mind-job.

                  Continued use only proves this is a way to make money. Probably the best available way. But to suggest that, so long as people are doing it, there cannot possibly be problems, is obvious crap.

                  Especially when you add “and more.” Oh: so this isn’t the exact right amount, as decreed by mighty god himself? We can talk about the middleman’s cut, so long as the rent goes up?

          • stillwater@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            What’s your metric for “well earned” here? What are some ways it could be earned? What do you think is the right amount?

      • pascal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Other than the fact it’s full of Chinese spyware?

        Let’s see…

        The interface sucks.

        The app is barely stable and crashes randomly.

        Absolutely zero thoughts on Linux gaming.

        Unusable communities.

        I’m sure others can give more reasons.

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        For starters, they put so little developments money into EGS that they went two years without a shopping cart, a feature that effectively every other online store has and could be custom coded properly in a day