cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/6400327

In case anyone is wondering, it’s rqd2.

The definition of paraphilia is “a condition characterized by abnormal sexual desires, typically involving extreme or dangerous activities.”, which can inclde pedophilia.

It has recieved 4 censures from fediseer due to the content contained on that instance

Not a good look for Lemmy to be promoting any instance like that.

You can see for yourself here

Update: A pull request was sent to remove the sus instance. It should no longer show up soon

  • shagie@programming.devEnglish
    121·
    1 year ago

    https://www.rainn.org/news/what-child-sexual-abuse-material-csam

    While the term child pornography is still widely used by the public, it’s more accurate to call it what it is: evidence of child sexual abuse. That’s why RAINN and others have stopped using the term child pornography and switched to referring to it as CSAM — child sexual abuse materials.

    While some of the pornography online depicts adults who have consented to be filmed, that’s never the case when the images depict children. Just as kids can’t legally consent to sex, they can’t consent to having images of their abuse recorded and distributed. Every explicit photo or video of a kid is actually evidence that the child has been a victim of sexual abuse.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.worldEnglish
      25·
      1 year ago

      100% grade A pure BULLSHIT

      If you can’t understand the difference between “porn” and “child porn”, that’s a problem that can’t be fixed by calling it CSAM. Because the problem is you’re either a pedophile or an idiot.

      Some ladder climbing asshole got published or tenured or promoted or something for inventing a new bullshit term. That’s the only reason it exists.