I used to see him all over the place and now nothing. I checked his post history and it’s been 24 days since he last posted anything.

I don’t know the guy or have any personal stake, but seeing someone everywhere just suddenly disappear is odd.

  • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I read the comments when they occurred and that’s what Squid communicated. I remember that he said he would do it and that a user had agreed to watch because it was shocking to read and he was very upset.

    I don’t remember further details, like which user backed out. Squid kept commenting for a long while after that so I just assumed he was being impulsive and calmed down.

    This might be completely unrelated to why he’s left, but it occurred. If you have the “real story,” go ahead and correct me.

    • Wren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I do have the real story but it’s not mine to tell, so I won’t relay it here. But yours is not correct. You’re misremembering what happened.

        • Wren@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          No it isn’t useless. You are misrepresenting what happened. I am here to make this statement. It is useful in that anyone that might have read what you said will hopefully disregard it as a result

          • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            And yet, you can’t articulate what’s wrong with it or why, so is that not a reason for people to completely disregard your assertion, too?

            If someone reads what both of us have said, neither of us can provide credible evidence that we are correct. That’s as useless of a conversation as I can imagine.

            You’re basically saying “nah, you’re wrong” and people are supposed to buy it based on your word? Again, useless.

            • Wren@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              I’m saying that you’re wrong in your telling of the story. I’m also saying that what happened should not have been public, but unfortunately was. But just because it was, that doesn’t mean any calling to it, or referencing it isn’t incredibly disrespectful to a person that was in the middle of a crisis.

              Their privacy should be taken into consideration regardless of whether or not the event was posted publicly.

              The comments were removed. There is no need to fill in blanks to tell a story that doesn’t need to be told.