Context was the idea of a government banning certain popular foods

  • Asetru@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    That’s anarchy? Wow, that’s dumb. They should not just collectively decide something. They should write down what they decided so that people who couldn’t attend or that later come from outside the community know what has been decided. Or, even better, if I know I can’t participate in the decision (or don’t want to) I should be able to pass my voice to somebody who’s there who I trust. Or, even better, just in case that person spontaneously gets sick or dies, to a group of people. Maybe, to get some consistency with people getting to know the details of the decision making process and the prior decisions, only redistribute these stand in votes every few years or so. Just to get the anarchy organised a bit.

    • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      That sounds great!

      Wait a minute… That doesn’t sound like anarchy… That sounds like democracy!