0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agorace conditionslemmy.zipimagemessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1883arrow-down124
arrow-up1859arrow-down1imagerace conditionslemmy.zip0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square87fedilink
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 month agoonly true if your language compiles to c. fortran peeps are safe.
minus-squareouRKaoS@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoI’m an 80’s/90’s BASIC bitch, so I’m still irrelevant!
minus-squareWhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month ago10 PRINT "FARTS" 20 GOTO 10
minus-squareratel@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoI thought it compiles to LLVM intermediate representation and then to the machine code of the requested platform arch. Am I missing something?
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoonly if you design it using llvm. llvm is pretty new.
minus-squareratel@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoAh ok I was referring to Rust specifically. Thanks!
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoFortran is from 1957, LLVM is from 2003. It’s probably like C where there is a compiler tool chain that goes through LLVM like you describe and others that go directly to executables.
only true if your language compiles to c. fortran peeps are safe.
I’m an 80’s/90’s BASIC bitch, so I’m still irrelevant!
I thought it compiles to LLVM intermediate representation and then to the machine code of the requested platform arch. Am I missing something?
only if you design it using llvm. llvm is pretty new.
Ah ok I was referring to Rust specifically. Thanks!
yeah but rednax wasn’t.
Fortran is from 1957, LLVM is from 2003. It’s probably like C where there is a compiler tool chain that goes through LLVM like you describe and others that go directly to executables.