We all see and hear what goes on over there. Kim will execute kids if they don’t cheer hard enough at his birthday party or something? He’s always threatening to nuke countries and is probably has the highest domestic kill count out of any world leader today.

So I ask? Why don’t any other countries step in to help those people. I saw a survey asking Americans and Escaped North Koreans would they migrate to North Korea and to the US if given the chance (hypothetical for the refugees). And it was like <0.1% to 95%. Obviously those people live in terror.

Why do we just allow this to happen in modern civilization? Nukes on South Korea? Is just not lucrative to step in? SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME PLEASE!?

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s more of a liberal delusion that they’re “usually” antiwar, but the one that’s happening now is always “different.” Liberals are right-wing, and generally their (especially US) meddling with regime change ends up installing a fascist who kills or imprisons the left.

    • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I mean sure, if you want to make up your own meaning for right wing, then go for it.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Liberalism is the ideology of capitalism. Capitalism is right-wing. Leftism is defined by anti-capitalism.

        In the UK, for example, the “Liberal Democrats” are right-leaning. It’s primarily in the US that “liberal” and “leftist” are used interchangeably, because once there was no longer a substantial (self-indentifying) socialist presence to scaremonger about, the right started scaremongering about liberals by equating them to socialists, and the meaning stuck. But I reject that and stick by the original meanings, which are used internationally.

        • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          In the UK, for example, the “Liberal Democrats” are right-leaning.

          Depends on the leadership. Sometimes they are, sometimes they aren’t. There have been times when they’ve been further left than Labour.

          Currently of course, that’s easy because Labour is too busy trying to appeal to Reform voters and Conservatives and are governing like they were the Democratic Party, which is a shame, because the country is desperately needing some wealth redistribution.

          Labour are in power because were gasping for some sanity after a succession of Conservative lunatics, but all the Conservative Party needs to do is stump up a leader who can sound like they have a couple of good ideas and have a bit of charisma and they’ll be back in power before you can say “short memory”.