• qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’ve been using ClickHouse too and it’s significantly faster than Postgres for certain analytical workloads. I benchmarked it and while Postgres took 47 seconds, ClickHouse finished within 700ms when performing a query on the OpenFoodFacts dataset (~9GB). Interestingly enough TimescaleDB (Postgres extension) took 6 seconds.

    Insertion Query speed
    Clickhouse 23.65 MB/s ≈650ms
    TimescaleDB 12.79 MB/s ≈6s
    Postgres - ≈47s
    SQLite 45.77 MB/s1 ≈22s
    DuckDB 8.27 MB/s1 crashed

    All actions were performed through Datagrip

    1 Insertion speed is influenced by reduced networking overhead due to the databases being in-process.

    Updates and deletes don’t work as well and not being able to perform an upsert can be quite annoying. However, I found the ReplacingMergeTree and AggregatingMergeTree table engines to be good replacements so far.

    Also there’s !clickhouse@programming.dev