• hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    With how expensive AI seems to be, it’s baffling to me how companies expect to turn a profit on it. 30B a year sounds more like the budget for an entire government scientific agency. And if that’s just for the data services…

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      microsoft already admitted it doesnt generate profit, so all these companies, including google, is ramming AI into all thier devices and services to recoup the losses.

      • demunted@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Even copilot explains that it’s answers are crippled by responding faster with less accuracy to reduce resource usage and there’s nothing the paying customer can do about it.

  • vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    We all will pay for it to Larry’s pocket and then he will pay the 3 letter agency for a favor. That’s how Larry is doing business for years.

  • bigmamoth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wtf, it doesn’t make a lot of sens since open ai doesn’t have the monopole of ia anymore. Also the only service they found to sell is literally a chatbot wich no company will find interesting if it cost too much