Is just the same as lemmy? What makes it different? Is it similar to kbin? Why is it meant to be better according so some people?

    • Rimu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, admins designate it.

      Most instances do not use this feature, afaik. piefed.social does but most of the others do not.

      • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        In the code there is a function that recognizes if the name of the community contains “meme” and if so does not add the upvote to the vote counter of the user

        • Rimu@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          37 minutes ago

          I wrote that code. It can be turned off or on by the instance admin. When an instance is created It’s off by default.

          Originally, when I wrote the feature comparison page, it could not be turned off.

    • zoey@lemmy.librebun.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have no idea! I’m already hosting Lemmy so I don’t really see the point personally.
      Just thought I’d look it up for OP.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I seriously doubt it because I’m pretty sure the point is to remove the ability for bot accounts and spammers/etc from farming up some karma to appear more legit for their nefarious/spamming purposes.

      • ccunning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I think either way could possibly be exploited.

        And putting all that aside, I think all image-centric subs should probably be included. It’s just as easy to farm karma with cute cats and flowers as it is with memes.

        • tpyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Excluding OC communities, right? Like you’re not discounting people who put a lot of time and effort into their photography? Or even if they’re not great photographers sharing pictures of their plants and gardens and hobbies, and pets, should have the same allowances as text only posts

          • ccunning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            20 hours ago

            This is a great comment; my initial reaction was “No because it would be easy to claim others OC was your own” but then the same could be said about text or link contributions.

            Then I thought “well maybe reputation should only be based on comments” but that could be unfair to those who primarily post vs comment.

            So now I don’t know what my position is. The best method is probably a blend of multiple strategies that can only be determined by engaging with the enemy.

            tl;dr: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

            • tpyo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              I appreciate this!

              Generally oc forward subs are very stringent about it truly being OC and if caught posting something that isn’t theirs will face consequences

              Blurry pics of a cat’s right up on the lens is low effort. Any pictures you see posted in a place like https://lemmy.world/c/astrophotography will not be low effort because those are removed. They also require the submissions to be OC