Debanking on wikipedia

So with the new regime executive order declaring it essentially illegal to be unhoused, people at risk might be thinking, “how do they classify me as homeless if I am surfing between friends or family or shelters?”

One of the big answers to this is the practice of debanking. If your financial institutions catch wind that you don’t have a stable address, they will try to close your accounts and send your balance as a cashier’s check to your last legal address. At-risk people understand the many, many scenarios where even just this process could be devastating.

Some unexpected ways you can get de-banked:

  • your apartment doesn’t have a legal address

  • you lose home owner’s insurance or your coverage changes and your bank decides it doesn’t like that

  • your building’s owner defaults

  • fire

  • flood

You may be at risk and just now realizing it. If you have an MH diagnosis and you don’t have two back-up legal addresses, you are on this Ex O.

Anyway, do not get debanked. Have legal address back-up plans EVEN IF YOU TRY TO FLEE THE COUNTRY because you do not want the regime classifying you as someone they want to put in the camps.

Sorry for another US-centric post.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      I didn’t know that existed!

      Its decline reads like everything else going on in the US. Government provided a service a lot of people liked, private enterprise lobbies to have it shut down and lock people into nickel and diming them.

      • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        In terms of private banks, a basic savings account wouldn’t really be a big risk for them nowadays because it’s a bare bones account. It doesn’t include things like access to credit cards or other forms of credits, or any form of long term investments.

        If anything, banks might even like the idea, because it gives them a way to offload their riskier (and let’s be honest less profitable) customers without making society fully collapse.

        If the system is implemented properly it’s a win-win for everyone.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I wish that was the case, but there are a lot of people that see government provided services as waste/fraud. I mean look at how the federal government is being eviscerated right now.

          It would be nice if everyone could be guaranteed a safe place to manage money though.