ryujin470@fedia.iocake to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 18 days agoIf copyright on a work expired immediately after death, would be that a bad or good idea?message-squaremessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up187arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up181arrow-down1message-squareIf copyright on a work expired immediately after death, would be that a bad or good idea?ryujin470@fedia.iocake to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 18 days agomessage-square91fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareparaphrand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-217 days agoI do think they said a publisher was involved. But what about when they are not?
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 days agoIf the duration of copyright is short enough, why reduce it further based on heartbeat?
minus-squareparaphrand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 days agoHmm, I think there may have been some confusion on my part here. I’m fine with copyright directly serving individual authors and their families. I’m not into how that is expanded and abused by corporations.
I do think they said a publisher was involved.
But what about when they are not?
If the duration of copyright is short enough, why reduce it further based on heartbeat?
Hmm, I think there may have been some confusion on my part here. I’m fine with copyright directly serving individual authors and their families.
I’m not into how that is expanded and abused by corporations.