So I’ve been looking at upgrading my PC and it looks like I can get a better “micro” pc than my current (ancient) desktop for significantly less money than a full blown gaming rig. An example of such a rig is this.

I don’t have high gaming requirements - I play mostly old games, I think the newest games I play are from 5+ years ago.

What reasons are there for not buying one of these (over a comparable “proper” desktop)?

  • mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    +1 on the Steam Deck train. I’ve been in the hospital the last few days, it’s been a godsend, playing Silksong between doctor visits.

    You can get a dock if you want a full sized monitor or a real mouse & keyboard. The deck also has two trackpads, which is sufficient for slower mouse games like city builders while in handheld mode.

    Because Valve is selling a lot of Decks, game developers are starting to use it as a watermark for low-end performance when tuning their games.

    I will admit the Deck’s CPU is a few years old, you can probably get a faster portable if you really want, but SteamOS makes things pretty easy. Technically I can drop the Deck into desktop mode with a Linux KDE environment, but I can’t remember the last time I had to. Maybe when I was trying Minecraft?

    • 𝕮𝕬𝕭𝕭𝕬𝕲𝕰@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I suppose it’s not solely for gaming which turns me off the deck option; it would also be serving as the entry point for some self hosted stuff I’m running on the clunky old unit that’s still chugging along.

      • mercano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Ah, well, it does have a desktop mode, but it’s Linux + KDE, not Windows. It can probably do what you want, but it would be some adjustment to the new environment.