Pesticides used in our homes, gardens and lawns and sprayed on foods we eat are contributing to a dramatic decline in sperm count among men worldwide, according to a new analysis of studies over the last 50 years.

    • DieguiTux8623@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had the same thought: the earth is already overpopulated. It’s not sustainable to have 8 billion people on this planet.

      • CJOtheReal@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah we need to go back to 3 billion, and stop listening to people that cry about aging population and there being less people… They are just idiots or people that want super cheap labor.

        • DieguiTux8623@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They want someone to pay for their retirement pension with taxes (if they were employees) or cheap labour if they are employers. Totally agree about all natality musings being idiotic nonsense. Mother nature is helping us with infertility, the ecosystem regulates itself.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is reduced sperm count a bad thing at this point in time? Didn’t we just pass the 8 billion mark in Earth’s population recently? We could probably stand to reduce the population gain for a bit.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Theoretically, but if the population falls from current numbers, the life quality will fall too because smaller number of working age people will have to support a higher population of retired people. That puts an enormous burden on young generations and strains the economy.

      • Agent641@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        working age people will have to support a higher population of retired people

        Will we though? Will we have to?

        Or might we just set their gophers on an ice floe from the arctic ice sheets they helped to melt and nudge them off into the ocean?

        • SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Life’s a pyramid scheme where you screw over the next generation by instilling a sense of duty in them to the ones that brought them here, in a non-consensual quid-pro-quo. ‘You were given this gift of life so you must take care of those that gave you this gift’.

          Then, of course, in order to keep it going, they themselves do the same, lest they end up holding the bag. Fun fact - some nations had titles like ‘hero mothers’ for people that had 3+ children.

          Though, I’d say that it isn’t really fair to collectively punish all retirees as they were also forced into this system by the ones before them and some may have chosen to not participate in it by increasing the population count further.

    • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It conflicts with growth at all cost economic systems which obviously are sustainable forever.