• Damage@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fedora is rock solid. I’ve had two consecutive laptops running it for … I don’t know, close to a decade? Never had any degradation.

    • heeplr@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Simply because software doesn’t degrade performancewise. It gets better on a new machine.

      Unless someone goes like “Sure, users probably never need this heavy feature but let’s bundle it anyway because fuck them!”

      • Damage@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, Windows, even when left isolated from the network, no updates, no installations, just normal usage, definitely degrades in performance over time. I know because I work with machines which use windows on their HMIs (terrible choice) and I see it happening.

    • Faresh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve heard so many good things about fedora now. My “it just works” desktop distro that I have been using in the past has been Debian testing (because debian stable packages are often so old many pieces of software can’t run on the system because the minimum version of some dependencies are too high). Being on testing has some disadvantages, though and I remember that somehow apt uninstalled coreutils and some other important packages (I have no idea how that happened), which meant I needed to reinstall the system, and #debian on IRC simply told me I shouldn’t be on testing if I’m not fine with some bugs. It is also overall feels less polished than stable.

      Maybe I Fedora is more appropriate for me. I’ve stuck to Debian, because apt is the package manager I’m most familiar (and thus more comfortable) with, but maybe dnf will be easy to pickup.