Free software and queer

  • 0 Posts
  • 54 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 20th, 2023

help-circle
  • NormalC@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.worldIs this even legal?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Using Microsoft Windows or any of its derivatives is endorsement of that software. Every user of Windows is a sucker. OP’s post is not the end nor the start.

    Get real, the audience of Windows is an audience of self-enabling victims.

    “But I have to use it for work!!! I have to make money!”

    You are still a sucker and perpetuating this broken system. If that makes you angry, it should, the artifice of respectable neo-liberal society was stripped from you.


  • NormalC@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.worldIs this even legal?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    No , you just gave up. Stop lying to yourself. You hide behind muh affordability because that’s the convenient excuse to use to not think about this.

    The status quo will benefit you for giving up entirely and disparaging those who advocate for freedom.

    “Teenage me” sounds like a mask off moment for you being a bitter out of touch person. You endorse the status quo and hide it under emotional rants of being more mature than the rest of us.

    “Nothing is pure… Rant about corpo crap”

    I’m only commenting to this because I don’t want younger folks or to be caught up in your self hate spiral.

    Its GNU/Linux because clowns like you exist and won’t shut up. People deserve better, they don’t deserve someone like you frothing at the mouth at the fact that you don’t believe a better world is possible.

    You’re incredibly lucky that a majority of “Linux”/tech communities tolerate you.





  • NormalC@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.worldHow Mozilla Ruined Firefox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t disagree with the points brought up specifically in the video about poor management internals at Mozilla corp, but this video doesn’t even scratch a major part of why FF is supported which is because Firefox will always be libre software unlike Chromium and Chrome which get hit with anti-features regularly that has to be patched out (never mind manifestv3 and web environment integrity).


  • NormalC@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.worldHow about Vivaldi Browser?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Vivaldi has proprietary components that the developers will not disclose due to chronic fears of “corporate espionage”

    Thus Vivaldi cannot be planted in a build farm nor be compiled yourself, so you have to take their precompiled binary and deal with it.

    Stop being scared and use Librewolf and keep ungoogled chromium in the back for compatibility (and terrible nonfree “webapps”).

    Nonfree browsers are a waste of everyones time.


  • The CCP [Communist Chinese Party] hackers utilized a vulnerability in the Microsoft software, and this was not due to ‘user error,’” Bacon wrote.

    Who names their child Bacon? Also this article gets the name wrong, It’s the Communist Party of China (CPC) not the “Communist Chinese Party” or whatever sinophobic nonsense he’s telling his base. I think this is less about the actual vulnerability and more about “evil communists” living in this guy’s head rent free that contribute to a very patriotic victim complex.






  • NormalC@lemmy.blahaj.zonetolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldThe greatest debate of our time
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I don’t use “google search” because it is nonfree software; linux was not started by the GNU project members. However, GNU does have a linux, it’s called Linux-libre.

    GNU is the operating system in its entirety. GNU/Linux is the name used to best describe the exact operating system by giving principal credit to the Linux foundation. The GNU part is to highlight the fact that it is a libre operating system first and foremost.

    Perhaps I need to reread the essays again, but the main takeaway is that what’s at stake here isn’t credit but the political legacy of software freedom. Something that is made obvious by your last remark.





  • And hardware can’t talk to it. Has it ever occurred to you that there’s more at stake here? That companies feel the need to lock away hardware in order to drive their profit line.

    At least GNU has something interesting to say about computer science. And for what it’s worth, it’s telling to know that you woild rather disparage GNU rather than the purposeful decisions made by executives and manufactuers to render both hardware and software undocumented and subjugating.

    But no! That’s “unfixable” and we need to learn how to “deal with it.” God forbid anyone makes a ruckus about it. Freedom for me but not for thee in this fast paced economy.

    You picked the status quo and are now complaining that people reject the status quo.