misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoMeta releases Threads API for developers to build “unique integrations”www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down14cross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.zip
arrow-up134arrow-down1external-linkMeta releases Threads API for developers to build “unique integrations”www.theverge.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.zip
minus-squaredanhab99@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoIsn’t threads.net activitypub?
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months agoIt’s unidirectional and opt-in
minus-squareAdanisi@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoSupposedly. Supposedly they also weren’t going to ignore the standard and do their own thing but I guess this disproves that.
minus-squaremisk@sopuli.xyzOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 months agoHaving own client API doesn’t affect ActivityPub compatibility.
minus-squareKayn@dormi.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months agoLemmy has its own API. Does this prove their ignorance of the standard too?
Isn’t threads.net activitypub?
It’s unidirectional and opt-in
Supposedly. Supposedly they also weren’t going to ignore the standard and do their own thing but I guess this disproves that.
Having own client API doesn’t affect ActivityPub compatibility.
Lemmy has its own API. Does this prove their ignorance of the standard too?