Sorry, I misread your comment.

deleted by creator

Thank you for your insightful reply.

I also found this: https://www.citizensforethics.org/news/analysis/trumps-politicization-of-the-u-s-marshals-service-is-a-threat-to-our-democracy/

It says that one of the primary functions of the US Marshals Service is to carry out judicial orders, but it reports to the president. This looks like a flaw to me.

Sorry, I’m a foreigner and I don’t understand much. Someone cares to explain? Should the police normally enforce judicial orders and sentences? Why do they not? Is the police personally loyal to Trump?

It’s a gnome foot though.

I don’t think the right would care.

Yea. Punishment only make sense in influencing future behavior. Once the AI exist… it already exists…

deleted by creator

I hope they are ready for the influx.

XMPP then

It’s possible she intended to use it for something else, such as scrapping food from dishes (sounds like a bad idea, but at least it’s safe hygiene-wise)

I was living with about 10k CAD/y for a few years when I was single and I was mostly fine.

Granted, this was in the 2010s. And of course I wasn’t in Manhattan, as you can guess by the currency.

Now, I’m making about 70k CAD with a family (sole provider) and I’m just staying afloat.

They can produce high-quality answers now, but that’s just because they wwre trained on things written by humans.

Any training on things produced by LLMs will just reproduce the same stuff, or even worse actually because it will include hallucinations.

For an AI to discover new things and truly innovate, or learn about existing products, the world, etc. it would need to do something entirely different than what LLMs are doing.

Wait what. I had been on reddit for years and I had never been aware of this. You get paid for upvotes?

And I thought “karma” was just another word for “upvotes”.

I reread the post replacing “pelican” with “politician”. I haven’t laughed this much in weeks. Thank you.

I’m aware of the mockery for “slam”, thanks.

Now that you are telling I’m reading it correct, I understand it must be a figurative sense of “torch”. I had taken it literally.

My first language isn’t English, and as I was trying to understand the headline, I thought “torch dead” might be an expression meaning, burning alive with torches or similar. So I was reading “reddit mods delete thread as doctors burn CEO alive”. The event described sounded much more brutal than it really was.

Emphasis on “heritage”.

I take their comment as a play on words.

There’s even actual enough reasons to be angry at people, such as hearing about senseless violence in the news, or seeing people litter, or not respect other people on the cycling path, or put their garbage in the recycle bin, etc.

It gets exhausting after a while so I mostly stop caring. But those are actual reasons. Why hate on random things that don’t affect anyone when there’s so much actual things to hate people for?