Well with sports games at least its “a realistic part of the experience”

Like when you watch a live sporting event on TV, there’s always commericals in-between the action. In that sense it fits the meta.

Also, sports games are the worst, pay 80 bucks every year for an updated roster and tweaks to the mechanics.

Buddy must have purchase a couple of bored apes just after the peak. He’s still waiting for them to peak again

Sometimes all it takes for them to step back, it is to be faced with having to go through with the action in detail, not just the presumed relief at the end.

Perhaps it was also the fact they saw someone in the same situation and it made them stop and think for a moment.

Either way, good on you, a life saved is a life saved. Whether through love, empathy or boredom.

NFTs are essentially a decentralized >token. This means that they can be >used to represent anything you might >want to represent with a token, e.g. >ownership of a physical object such as a car or a house; ownership of a digital >asset, such as a website or game

No.

NFTs are not proof of ownership. At best they are the equivalent to receipts, at worse they are mere url links. They are certainly not title deeds, not proof of copyright ownership or anything of that sort. They are just a ledger that person D paid something to person C who paid something to person B who paid something to person A.

Lets use those NFT monkeys as an example. There is literally no proof anywhere on that NFT chain that person A is the rightful copyright owner or has the rights to sell said image. Furthermore, there is no proof that person A gave the rights to person B to resell said image. Or that anyone down the chain sold the complete rights instead of just selling the link to access monkey.jpg

Son goes crazy in a good way or bad way?

Like I can imagine a 4 year old going wild with excitement cause the parents are home. Or a 14 year old cringing hard

😑

Like this?

Get yours! Now with 50% more AI™

Hurry while stocks last!

Oh god. The mother has 5 fingers.

5 fingers, not including thumbs…

That’s why they’ll fail. Thats why so many movies with a great IP to back them fail. They become more interested in profits than telling a good story.

And thats why great movies like the Lego Movie and Puss in Boots the last wish came out of left field and became huge hits. Because they focused on a great story first.

Too bad RDR2 online is dead and abandoned by the devs

This is great. Really brings back the early 2000s vibe of something awful and cracked before they sold out.

Have you tried spitting back?

Good luck with the tankies and 50 cent army.

Wash day tomorrow, nothing clean right?

If you mean Jesus as described word for word in the bible? Yes you are right. Such a mythical figure never existed.

A man name Jesus from the first century AD? Who preached in the Levant? Who was baptized by a man named John and was later crucified? There is good enough evidence of such a person existing. This isn’t even a debated question among new testament scholars anymore.

I see you are familiar with Bart Ehrman, Even he doesn’t dispute that a historical Jesus existed.

https://youtu.be/43mDuIN5-ww

Here’s an even deeper dive from Bart Ehrman.

https://youtu.be/4CD5DwrgWJ4

Physical proof? No. But if that’s the criterion for proof that someone existed, then that mean 90% of historical figures can’t be proven to have existed. We don’t have the remains of Alexander the Great or any artefacts we can be sure are his. We have no remnants of Plato, none of his original writings remain.

Did a person name Jesus live sometime during the first century AD? Scholars are fairly certain of that. We do have textual evidence other than the bible that points to his existence.

It is highly unlikely that he was anything like the person written about in the bible. He was likely one of many radical apocalyptic prophets of the time.

We don’t have too many details about his life but because of something called the criterion of embarrassment we have good reason to believe he was baptized by a man named John the Baptist and was later crucified. (i.e. most burgeoning religions seeking legitimacy don’t typically invent stories that are embarrassing to their deity)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

Taking a page out of the EA Playbook it seems…

Conspiracy theory here…

Maybe this is an initiative by competing platforms? Epic? Ubisoft?

Stir some shit, hope to get valve in legal issues so that they’re legally forced to become less competitive and therefore creating a chance for these other platforms?

Garuda has an abysmal safety record. I’m banking it wasn’t a design or production issue with the 747.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Garuda_Indonesia_incidents_and_accidents

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garuda_Indonesia#European_ban_(2007–2009)

This is the sound I make when I’m calling my cat to come home for the night…