Criminal contempt of business model, indeed.

You’re berating them for their opinion and can’t understand why they’d self censor?

Previous comment

Circunstancial evidence points to Boeing being a failed company.

Corporations getting killed for mismanagement isn’t a problem. That’s make believe. Another Corp will pick the bones of the first one. The first should die. Corporations were always meant to last only a couple decades by design.

What’s so funny that had you loling?

The rest can opt between Comcast and AT&T. FML.

Holy shit.

Not all Shapiros are created equal.

France has something similar in their books. But it’s not enough for you to be recognizable, you sort of have to be both recognizable and the subject of the photo. But that would just mean neither party gets to use the photo unless they agree on terms. There are exceptions for journalism and other situations.

It’s quite complicated. There’s a reason most places don’t follow that model. And you can always cover yourself in public if you don’t want people to see your image. It’s a point where the freedom of two parties collide and there’s no clear answer on where one ends and the other begins. The law has to draw a line somewhere.

Most these jobs aren’t the kind you clock in and out.

Indefinitely? Cause that’s how it usually goes this side of the pond.

The downvotes are because you’re the kind of rug your boss cleans his boots on, making it worse for everybody in the company. You’re the problem employee.

Any image of you in public belongs to the person capturing it. Imagine what it would be like if that wasn’t the case. All the pictures you ever took, if there are people in them other than you, you need a signed model lease.

I don’t agree with them, but you can’t just call someone a nazi without evidence.

“Will somebody think of the companies that create the illegal immigration problem in the first place” is the worst take possible in all this.

Tough crowd. I liked it.

Considering Mozilla owes more that 50% of its funding to Google, I can see their behavior rubbing off on them.

Adding it back. They pioneered it way back, even before there was a PWA, they had a similar solution. It was not perfect, but scratched many itches and was trending in the right direction. Then they dropped. One of the many casualties of Mozilla’s mismanagement. And this one really tickles the conspiracy theorist in me.

On a more practical note: add shortcuts to these sites in your desktop/start menu/launcher. It’s not the same, but your muscle memory will thank you.

SHOCKED! _/s

I’d rather not attribute to malice what is more easily explained by incompetence.

I am under the same predicament, but found that I can still use FF by spoofing the user agent on those “chrome only” websites. I don’t recall ever having an issue, but in case a specific functionality fails for you, all you gotta do is open up a chromium browser to sidestep the problem.