• mang0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Please explain to me how I ignored it? This is Twitter style of “you said you like pancakes? That means you hate waffles!”

    • Noxy@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      You argued that real porn is bad because of exploitation of women, but there’s so much porn out there where that simply isn’t true. An obvious example would be gay (male) porn where no women are present.

      Not that I disagree that there isn’t a huge problem of exploitation of women, or staggering amounts of reinforcement of bullshit gender roles, or countless other problems. But, genuinely, not all porn is bad.

      • Senal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Hah, i like how you did the thing they just mentioned, in the first sentence no less and then for the entire rest of the reply.

        Classic trolling, 5 stars, no notes.

      • mang0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fair enough. I imagine that it’s typically women who get exploited the most but men aren’t exluded