• LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    Lemmy.zip is UK based and ended up blocking anyone from the UK from visiting the site 🤷

  • 𝔽𝕩𝕠𝕞𝕥@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    5 days ago

    I can only answer for dbzer0/anarchist.nexus but FUCK NO. We ain’t gonna do that shit lol. If we ever have trouble with the law in any country, we can always backup and move.

  • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    5 days ago

    Compliance depends on the instance. Pick an instance where the admin doesn’t give a dingo’s kidney, or an instance located in a country where the local law doesn’t require age verification.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m waiting to see exactly how the UK plans to compel me, someone who lives outside the UK with a Lemmy server hosted outside the UK, to follow their rules.

        If they find me non-compliant, they can block my site.

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        We are witnessing the next step along the way to a completely fragmented web. Sort of like the DataKrash, but in slow motion. This time, it’s driven by legislation instead of a single netrunner.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The EU didn’t completely fragment. Could just be the next step to the UK totally walling itself off from the world.

      • hisao@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        I struggle to understand, why do those sites block uk users? Are there really any “international regulations” that demand that if you don’t want to comply with whatever arbitrary rules some country set, you should stop serving users from that country?

        • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          The UK law says anyone found noncompliant will owe 10% of GLOBAL REVENUE in fines.

          So companies don’t even want to deal with that bullshit

          • hisao@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            This is interesting, I did a bit of research and it seems, none of this is legally enforceable unless the company has EU presence. Basically EU just saying “we will do everything we can, but we can’t really do anything if you don’t have any operations on our land”.

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Correct - but if you don’t comply and ever step foot in a EU country or a country that will extradite to the EU, you’re fucked. Most people hosting a Lemmy instance will shit themselves at the thought of having millions of dollars in fines and an arrest warrant against their name in a foreign country, even if they never intend on going to that country.

    • Prathas@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Hmm, do we know which countries will be exempt? I hadn’t thought about that…

      Also, how will they enforce who can just ignore the requirement? Will they not take noncompliant websites down by nameservers or something?

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I’ve only heard about UK, Australia and certain states in America. If you live in Kazakhstan next to Borat, you should be fine.

        As always, EU is complicated, so we’ll have to wait and see how that works out.

        • hisao@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Twitter / X started asking for age verification for adult content when browsed from EU. Works fine from Asia but you also need to set your account country to the one you’re browsing from.

          • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            So, if you can’t even use Xitter for porn is there anything left? What even is the propose of that site any more?

            • hisao@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              It’s still the biggest art posting platform. And I’m not even sure where art posters should migrate to… I mean sure it would be nice to have them scattered across different fediverse instances, but it would be nice for us, not for them. The main thing they get from X is massive algorithmic reach. You hit like on a Miku art and another artist with their Miku art immediately slips into your feed, you like it even more and you decide to check their profile and you like their other works and you subscribe. This kind of easy and efficient advertisement is something that doesn’t exist anywhere else outside of few centralized systems.

              • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                There’s always the classics. Diviant art, new grounds, ink bunny, pixv, Tumblr, and fur affinity.

                If you ever want to share art just look to were the furries flea too. You won’t ever find a group more determined to share their art then them.

              • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                4 days ago

                Why don’t art posters use y’know something dedicated to art or images and not microblogging?

                Like DeviantArt or Tumblr, the two once popular with artists sites designed for them.

                • hisao@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Pixiv, Fanbox, DeviantArt, Tumblr, etc, are also widely used. Very few people only use a single platform. I think Twitter is top 1 for expanding your audience not only because how well their feed algorithm works, but maybe also because all those focused platforms are used more by artists and less by viewers (or used less often by viewers), while Twitter being general-purpose is the one where more people who like to watch/discover arts but are not artists themselves, are. But there are other factors, like Twitter comments being better than Pixiv or DeviantArt comments, etc. Finally, if we return to the context of this discussion, I don’t think any of those dedicated platforms in any way solve the problem of age verification and that is why I wouldn’t recommend migrating to them in this context even if they were otherwise good for art.

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              I don’t understand why anyone would ever use Twitter for porn in the first place lol. Porn sites exist……

              I’ve been on Twitter for like 16 years now and porn has never been something I’ve seen or even thought to search for on there. It makes no sense.

              • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Oh trust me, stuff you didn’t even imagine could exist can be found in that wretched hive of depravity and fornication. If you never click any of that, the algorithm won’t know how dirty your mind is. On the other hand, you could also do the exact opposite and click on everything horny. That will turn your whole feed into a wicked orgy. Let’s just say that it’s a surprisingly versatile site.

      • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        There isn’t a global law about age verification they countries could be exempt of. It’s individual countries doing it.

        And on top of that the laws are different from what I’ve seen, in the UK for example you have to fullfil certain criteria to fall under that law. But frankly it seems to be a mess in my opinion.

        This is what an age verification service says about it:

        https://www.yoti.com/blog/understanding-age-verification-online-safety-act/

  • Pamasich@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Will Lemmy instances be forced to verify users’ ages identities?

    If they’re located in the UK, sure. But given how small Lemmy instances are, I assume they’ll fly under the radar.

    Non-UK instances won’t be forced to do anything. The UK can’t do shit outside their borders, so as long as the instance’s operator doesn’t set foot into the country, all they can do is block the instance in the UK.

    • Buckshot@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      Was wondering about this, I’m in UK, I could just make my own instance, I’m the only user so I verify my own age, federate with everyone. All good? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • Toes♀@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        I love that idea.

        If you do, I’d like to know what kind of bandwidth and system usage it demands.

        I’ve been wondering if a pi could do this for me and my few friends.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Well they can do shit - they can put out arrest warrants and fines, and possibly have the person extradited to the UK depending on the country.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Right, but realistically this would be far too much work. Like, they would need to do the same for every digital sex worker who has ever spun up their own website. It’s just not feasible.

      • Pamasich@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        they can put out arrest warrants and fines

        Of course they can, but they’re unenforceable if the instance’s operator has no presence nor assets in the UK. That’s why I wrote “forced” in bold. They can issue shit, but that’s where it stops.

        and possibly have the person extradited to the UK

        According to Wikipedia, extradition requires that the crime is such in BOTH countries. So no, I don’t see that being an option here.

        • dustycups@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          According to Wikipedia, extradition requires that the crime is such in BOTH countries. So no, I don’t see that being an option here.

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I really don’t see that happening. The internet and the real people that build it tend to be innovative tinkerers and hackers. Things get built because there’s a need and someone tries to say they can’t. P2P, darknets, proxies, VPNs, heck the whole concept of the fediverse defies the idea of control by an external entity. So they may try, but the chances are slim it works.

  • MrNesser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    In the UK the law is largely unenforceable. VPN usage has shot up since it came in and there was a reveal the houses of parliament are exempt from the requirement.

    The internet safety law is impacting larger companies that profit from adult content such as red GIFs and pornhub.

    Facebook hasn’t been called out yet despite the very obvious adult content in their reels.

    Smaller sites are flying under the radar for now. Lemmy probably due to it’s distributed nature.

    • Prathas@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      the houses of parliament are exempt from the requirement.

      Of course, the jerks…

      • MrNesser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’ve always said the only way to make this fair is for the big sites to publish viewing data

  • Mugita Sokio@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Mastodon has nothing they can do to implement digital ID’s, which is what age verification is. Lemmy might not have the technology to do it, because it’s libre and a protocol.

  • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    No, just like they don’t give a fuck about your privacy either. If any instance does get big enough then yeah it’s fucked.

  • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t think I’ll block any, but then I only have a few friends using my instance.

    I’m in the odd boat that my server in in Australia (for the AU laws), but I call it a NZ instance - where I live