California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.
The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, has already filed a notice to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.
This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning certain types of magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.
Well, if you can’t fight then a gun is your best option.
Can you fight?
Didn’t think so.
What does it matter if I can fight? Without bullets, I have no right to self defense.
It matters because if you can’t fight, you’re going to lose to someone who can.
You’re more likely to shoot a friend or family member, not the bad guy with a gun that you’re hoping for.
I’m the one being told I should have a gun, not the one saying I have a gun! Besides, the right to self-defense is all about bullets it seems, so as long as I can chuck bullets at the guy, I’ll be legally protected!
I was replying to bobman and it shows up that way for me.
Does it not for you?
I think you may have accidentally replied to me, it’s in my inbox and I see it under my comment.
This might be on me, I might have had the wrong tab open or misread something!
I could be a kung fu master but apparently if I don’t have bullets, I have no right to self-defense, so I will be legally screwed either way!