• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    8 days ago

    If the governor activates them first, it limits the reasons the president can activate them and override the governor.

    Of course Trump would try to do it anyway, meaning the NG commander would have to decide who to follow (and let’s be real, it would probably be the president).

    • AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      States giving up their military power was a mistake. States need to rebuild and restore their State Guards/State Defense Forces. The ability to federalize the National Guard removes its ability to function as the State Militias that it replaced.

      • Sir Arthur V Quackington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        No, the mistake was the complete corruption of US politics through naked graft and a FPTP voting system leading to extremist views being the only rallying opposition to reasonable stances.

        The government needs to get purged of lobbyists and money.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        No, being able to federalize them was intended. We weren’t supposed to have a standing federal army, only call them up from the militias as needed.

        Turned out pretty quick that that didn’t work too well in reality.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        State militias were never intended to fight the national government. In fact, they were intended to help fight insurrection.

        Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15. The Congress shall have Power * * * To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.