Their offer, confirmed by Clooney’s spokesperson on Thursday, would provide the union an extra $150 million over three years and could help fund improved health benefits.

Clooney also said top stars would only collect residuals once lower-paid actors received theirs.

“A lot of the top earners want to be part of the solution,” Clooney told Hollywood publication Deadline, which first reported the news. “We think it’s fair for us to pay more into the union.”

A SAG-AFTRA spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

  • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    152
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “A lot of the top earners want to be part of the solution,” Clooney told Hollywood publication Deadline

    Look, this is a super swell offer but George Clooney shouldn’t be bailing major studios out of their obligations. They can afford to settle the strike all on their own they just choose not to. Frankly, I think George should stop trying to score points for his generosity and grab a picket sign and make himself useful. He isn’t the problem but he’s not the fucking solution either.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The “top stars” are also hurting. They are more likely to be invested in films, or expecting big paydays to pay their big mortgages. So George and company may be willing to kick in some pocket change to clear the logjam.

      • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Big actors are also producers/executive producers of everything they work on (unless is something like marvel I guess) and pretty sure the real money come from that. They have a conflict of interest on the strike.

        • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Just because you personally benefit from the existing system doesn’t mean that you should accept it as OK the way it is, or that it is not capable of being changed to something better, and rejecting the existing system is always a choice. (I thought we went over this in the movie already!)

          So, having a production company (I just want more of me on the credits OK?) doesn’t mean that I shouldn’t to march and picket and fight for what’s right.

          • norbert@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’d be a beautiful thing if the top Hollywood stars showed some real solidarity and started/used their own production companies to give SAG-AFTRA a fair deal and make some creative, original films. It’d probably scare big studios knowing there was money being made that they weren’t getting their cut of.

      • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, while most big actors have put on an outward show of solidarity with the strikes, let’s not pretend they’re not basically in the same position as the studio execs

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That was kind of what I thought. While it’s nice he is doing this, he should have done it after the strike. This only serves to let the studios off the hook.

    • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Plus when IATSE is next up to negotiate they’re going to get hosed because “not even SAG-AFTRA could get that”.

  • Koof_on_the_Roof@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s easy to be cynical and 150M towards health benefits seems like a good and altruistic offer but shouldn’t the studio be paying health benefits. Is this just a golden strike buster so top Hollywood actors can get back to earning millions while the rest return to crappy conditions.

    • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Imo Clooney et al. are hoping to get all the actors back to work because strike pay isn’t cutting it. Bribing AFTRA isn’t a bad thing at this point as there’s already stories of actors loosing housing, etc.

    • iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The studio should be, but that would have to be in the bargaining agreement.

      I don’t know of any company that pays for regular health benefits for gig work. I’ve had contract work at a long term site (government contracts) pay for healthcare but never heard it for entertainment.

  • argo_yamato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    That would be great for funding health benefits but what about studios using actor’s likenesses via AI and not paying them at all. That is the point that sticks out to me.

  • Talaraine@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I low key think they’re just trying to help and who’s gonna be mad at that…

    They aren’t helping.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean it is…

      Clooney is saying people that make as much as he does should pay more into the union then someone whose had a handful of TV commercials over the last decade.

      Having union dues be an uncapped percentage of earnings is basically the same as a progressive tax bracket where the more you earn, the higher percent is paid to taxes.

      Flat union dues aren’t bad for most vocations. But actors have insane income disparities, all of show biz does.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are they going to give that $150 million every year? Under a contract with SAG-AFTRA? Otherwise, I hope the response is, “nice offer, but no thanks.”

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Actors shouldn’t be paying, studios should. If they can pay the top actors big bucks, they should be able to shift some of that money to the rest.