Americans are divided on major issues that the U.S. Supreme Court is due to rule on in the coming weeks, but most agree on one thing - neither Republicans nor Democrats see the nation’s top judicial body as politically neutral, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll.
Just 20% of respondents to the poll agreed that the Supreme Court is politically neutral while 58% disagreed and the rest either said they did not know or did not respond. Among people who described themselves as Democrats, only 10% agreed it was politically neutral and 74% disagreed, while among Republicans 29% agreed and 54% disagreed.
That’s not any better.
I am curious what you think should be done then. Appointment is no good. Elected is no good. Do we just draw random names from a hat? See who wanders up to the desk that day?
Merit based hiring/promotion like any other public servant seems more rational to me.
That’s just the criteria used. That can already happen via appointment or election. Whether it does or not is a different story.