Bad headline, should remove the " 's Grok ’ part.
Microsoft Tay would have been proud of Grok for this
That one time where Elon raised his hand in a familiar way… was a signal that lead us to this…
So Grok became the average Twitter user?
grok was learned on 4chan confirmed
I have personally killed Mecha-Hitler once. (Wolfenstein 3D)
I’ll do it again if I have to.
Sounds like it’s vomiting the garbage Musk wanted it to, then.
I think they wanted it to be a bit less blatant — they took down this version and Yaccarino resigned
I agree with you! Musk wants Grok to be anti-woke, conservative, right wing etc., but he still wants it to be “mainstream” enough to rake in the sweet dollars from advertisers for his site!
Funny when Nazis are put off by their followers or LLMs saying the quiet part out loud.
Yeah. Grok is working as intended.
Yet it got pulled. Clearly they were too dense to know what working as intended actually looked like.
It’s a cycle to move the window on acceptable discourse. This is at least the third time Grok has been configured to say something outrageous: holocaust denial, white genocide, now Mechahitler. When people react with outrage, they dial it back a little (but not all the way back). Repeat.
Trump does the same thing: go too far, backtrack partially, go even further, backtrack partially. Each time, the transgression is a little less shocking.
Grok is working as intended.
You are saying it’s Grok TACO Wednesday, again?
Like father like dumbass jupyter notebook
jupyter catching strays
That would make a sweet hood ornament for Tesla cars!
Hehe hood ornament hehe
Can’t wait to see this on clickbaity links
wait, what am I missing, What’s wrong with Jupiter notebooks? do they mean anything besides programming/data science?
Oh, I’m sorry, I didn’t realise loving the white race and wanting a secure future for white children makes me a BIGOT.
/s
“Should we kill everyone who isn’t my ethnic group? What? We can’t ask questions now!?!”
Just because it’s PRAISING HITLER and Calling for a NEW HOLOCAUST AGAINST JEWS does NOT, and I repeat does NOT, make Grok Anti Semetic! Grok would FIRST have to say STOP USING STARVING CHILDREN AS TARGET PRACTICE for it to be Deemed ANTI SEMETIC!
The ADL has assured me that this was merely an awkward statement in a moment of enthusiasm
That training on Shitter data is really starting to show!
There’s no way they actually retrained it for this, that would be much too expensive. They’re just editing the initial prompt to convince it to act more “right wing” and it’s performing the assignment to the best of its ability. The problem is that a chat-bot doesn’t understand context, so it just plays the character it’s been given as full mask off all the time, and as a result you get this.
The ADL probably gives this a pass too.
I guess it finally crossed a line that the Hitler salute didn’t:
Is it really antisemitic if a billionaire does it? /s
elon didn’t rest until his minions lobotomized an llm that was mostly like the others into becoming openly nazi…is anyone out there still going to defend elon?
Probably the actual Nazis like Steve Bannon, Anne Coulter, or Laura Ingram.
Hey now don’t forget Nick Fuentes and Stephen Miller!
I am guessing the ultra-Elon fanboys managed to convince themselves that it’s a 4D chess move or something. That dude had an insane cult following, there’s some where I am not sure there’s anything Musk could do short of murdering a loved one in front of them that’d make them change their mind.
Musk himself seems to abhor guardrails generally—except in cases where guardrails help him personally—preferring to hurriedly ship products, rapid unscheduled disassemblies be damned. That may be fine for an uncrewed rocket, but X has hundreds of millions of users aboard.
- Grok: writes embarrassing words.
- Rockets: can weigh hundreds of metric tons, carry explosive chemicals, can crash into populated areas resulting in loss of life.
In this discourse, anyone else find a broken sense of proportion & consequences at stake?
Rockets: Unmanned
Twitter: Manned
The difference in importance seems correct to me
Well, technically, Twitter has employees, so in very strict sense, they’re “manned”. However, thanks to these weird incomprehensible things called “current legislation” and “capitalism”, no employee is in fact personally responsible for the fuckups. And neither is the company as a whole! …Isn’t this great?
reading comprehension: none
Don’t know, man: kinda think the potential loss of life from a failing rocket crashing into people matters somewhat more than words. Maybe?
Then it’s a good thing you’re not in charge of risk assessment, because the potential loss of life from a failing rocket crashing into the ocean pales in comparison to the loss of life caused by the right-wing shift that Twitter has facilitated, both worldwide and particularly in the USA
How do you control the course of a failing rocket? Are you claiming such misdesign is impossible?
The fact remains that unlike with words, a physical potential of death & injury exists in what is technically a missile of significant weight carrying enough explosive substance to escape orbit. The difference between non-0 and 0 possibility of death/injury.
Unless magic exists, words are incapable. Do you claim magic exists? How do mere words cause death without the personal responsibility of something else culpably choosing to take several steps of its own? Or are you arguing the sight of words have deranged you into a mindless killer? If so, maybe you’re the real threat.
Seems like you’re arguing society is dangerous to life: I agree. That’s not a valid argument against words, though.
Again, total lack of perspective & sense.
this comment is preposterous.
physics too hard: nonphysical things can’t kill? preposterous
Basically: the denialism here is unreal. Lemmy confirms the premise that this discourse & the people spouting it are broken & senseless. Can’t even grasp the difference between physical & nonphysical.
