• mang0@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Please explain to me how I ignored it? This is Twitter style of “you said you like pancakes? That means you hate waffles!”

          • Noxy@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            You argued that real porn is bad because of exploitation of women, but there’s so much porn out there where that simply isn’t true. An obvious example would be gay (male) porn where no women are present.

            Not that I disagree that there isn’t a huge problem of exploitation of women, or staggering amounts of reinforcement of bullshit gender roles, or countless other problems. But, genuinely, not all porn is bad.

            • Senal@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Hah, i like how you did the thing they just mentioned, in the first sentence no less and then for the entire rest of the reply.

              Classic trolling, 5 stars, no notes.

            • mang0@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Fair enough. I imagine that it’s typically women who get exploited the most but men aren’t exluded