There’s a stark difference in success rates between companies that purchase AI tools from vendors and those that build them internally.

Despite the rush to integrate powerful new models, about 5% of AI pilot programs achieve rapid revenue acceleration; the vast majority stall, delivering little to no measurable impact on P&L.

The research—based on 150 interviews with leaders, a survey of 350 employees, and an analysis of 300 public AI deployments—paints a clear divide between success stories and stalled projects.

  • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    32·
    2 days ago

    Financially, I earn a really low amount. I e been freelance for a while, but am trying to grow the business, so it’s extremely small.

    All the stuff I’m using AI for is just for presentation of internal materials. Nothing critical.

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      3·
      2 days ago

      I feel similar.

      The AI is great for low value tasks that eat time but aren’t difficult nor require high skill, nor are they risky. That’s the stuff that’s traditionally really difficult to automate.

      When I’m actually doing the core parts of my job AI is so awful it’s clear humans are not going anywhere.

      But those annoying side tasks need to get done.

      I’ve set up a bunch of read only AI tool and that’s enough to speed up huge amounts of work.