There’s a stark difference in success rates between companies that purchase AI tools from vendors and those that build them internally.

Despite the rush to integrate powerful new models, about 5% of AI pilot programs achieve rapid revenue acceleration; the vast majority stall, delivering little to no measurable impact on P&L.

The research—based on 150 interviews with leaders, a survey of 350 employees, and an analysis of 300 public AI deployments—paints a clear divide between success stories and stalled projects.

  • ameancow@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3·
    1 day ago

    I’m sorry if you hope so,

    Arguing that there’s an economic scheme threatening AI development and you translate it as “hope” that there is going to be an economy-destroying bubble burst, tells me I won’t get far in this conversation. Maybe figure out if there’s a less emotional/defensive path for looking at all this.

    • JumpyWombat@lemmy.ml
      22·
      1 day ago

      Maybe figure out if there’s a less emotional/defensive path for looking at all this

      If you start with

      I think some people are so hung up on knee-jerk defensiveness of AI that they lose sight of everything but promoting it.

      you should expect to be seen as one of those with that irrational hate for a technology.

      Back in topic: can this be a bubble like the dot-com? Of course. Is it? Probably not.

      95% of failures should be a warning for all those fools who expects something that this technology cannot do. Nothing more than that.