• Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also if we removed single use plastics, but didn’t dramatically cut back on everything we do that uses them, then we’d create more pollution with alternative methods trying to fill the gap. A global change is unavoidable, whether it is chosen or forced upon everyone by circumstance.

    • jasondj@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is part of the issue that a lot of people don’t get.

      Plastics are, largely, petrochemicals. We have plastics because we have oil.

      Use glass because it’s more recyclable? Glass is heavier and more fragile, meaning more cost to ship and more breakage in transit.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah… we use single use plastics because they’re basically an industrial miracle production wise. Dirt cheap, super easy to use, innumerable applications… and all the drawbacks are post-production and someone else’s problem. A tough addiction to break.

      • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Use glass because it’s more recyclable? Glass is heavier and more fragile, meaning more cost to ship and more breakage in transit.

        Meaning more local production and collection.

          • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s certainly incompatible with multi-national corporations with huge vertical integration. This is what happened with beer, soda and other stuff in many parts of the world.

            I have lived in that World in my part of Eastern Europe, I lived plastic-free… it was the default.