The fact that you keep changing the subject demonstrates that you are not interested in arguing in good faith. The correct course of action is to vote in such a way that your vote influences the outcome positively. By voting for a 3rd party candidate, you are choosing to not influence the result, which is irresponsible.
You changed the subject from preventing fascism to nitpicking democrats. That’s called whataboutism. You imply that you have no legitimate counter-argument by taking attention away from the point that shatters your argument. A person in the right would have no need for such evasive tactics.
The fact that you keep changing the subject demonstrates that you are not interested in arguing in good faith. The correct course of action is to vote in such a way that your vote influences the outcome positively. By voting for a 3rd party candidate, you are choosing to not influence the result, which is irresponsible.
you can characterize my vote any way you like. I’ll characterize yours as supporting genocide.
Don’t pretend you care about genocide when you’ve clearly announced your plan to enable a known terrorist.
I have no plans to enable genocide. by contrast many in this thread have announced their plan to vote for biden
I haven’t changed the subject at all.
You changed the subject from preventing fascism to nitpicking democrats. That’s called whataboutism. You imply that you have no legitimate counter-argument by taking attention away from the point that shatters your argument. A person in the right would have no need for such evasive tactics.
I’m not being evasive
it’s not whataboutism
your accusation of bad faith is itself bad faith.
“No u” you’re not digging yourself out of that hole
doubling down doesn’t change the facts