• aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Direct voting is the future.

    We have frequent ballot measures in California and as a voter I do a lot of work to understand those ballot measures that many do not have the time or the ability to do. California ballots may have 5-10 questions on them, and these things already take a long time to properly research and understand…Can you imagine the complexity when you’re talking about national issues and especially thinking of running the entire government that way?

    It’s a full-time job. There’s no way it’s scalable to run a country this large with this many competing interests using direct voting. You’d spend your whole life voting on or researching on voting on things.

    Ultimately, you’d wind up with industry writing all of the law proposals and a misrepresented version of those coming across some kind of voting device. We’d still continue our slow slide into some sort of industrial feudalism, just without the politicians to blame for it.

    I think proportional representation and ranked choice voting are both better ideas.

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mmm, your entire point can be negated by acknowledging that politicians and elections are usually bought out.

      Do you think Congress represents the will of the people? Do you think it should?

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mmm, your entire point can be negated by acknowledging that politicians and elections are usually bought out.

        How is anything I’ve posted negated by the fact that corruption exists?