Anyone else have a similar experience with one of these drives?

  • Offlein@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    479
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    What the fuck are all these comments?

    It’s an article about an unresolved and recurring problem with a popular drive that the ostensibly reputable manufacturer is trying to hide.

    But 90% of the comments are people jerking themselves off about how smart they are for using RAID, which is irrelevant to the point of the article… But never miss an opportunity to pleasure yourself in public I guess?

    • saddlebag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      136
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy definitely showing the same symptoms as Reddit as it grows. Too many people trying to show off how technically smart they are and just come off as obnoxious dweebs

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know why people think that this behavior would ever be restricted to Reddit, Twitter, Facebook, etc.?

        There’s one common element in all these systems…

      • klyde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s becoming more and more noticeable and it’s making me sad.

        • ffolkes@fanexus.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The thing is, there’s nothing wrong with sharing knowledge or pointing out best practices. What sucks is people replying JUST to point out the flaws and then gloat, without even fully comprehending what happened in the article. But this behavior has been around way longer than reddit.

          • NotYourSocialWorker@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I feel it’s the same kind of people who complain regarding the same questions popping up at a forum often. I don’t get why they can’t just ignore them? Sure you could maybe find the answer by googling but sometimes you want to interact with others. Plus you might learn things you didn’t know you should also have asked.

            My feeling is that Stackexchange is the place that has taken this the furthest with the result that new people can neither ask any questions nor get any points to get more rights on the site.

        • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          It think it has always been there, it’s part of the internet and tech culture. Lemmy is not going to magically change that. We can try to make it better by writing good contributions and supporting those who do.

      • atticus88th@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy guess… this is your 2nd go with a social media platform?

        Lemmy sit you down on my knee son and let grandpa here explain how social media worked in his old times of facebook just like I sat on my grandpappys knee and he explained to me the days of AIM.

        /s

    • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t believe you but yeeeeeesh. Lots of self righteous penises ITT. If people buy an expensive hard drive, it should work. Not everyone knows everything there is to know about data storage, have a little grace people

    • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      What, you don’t do RAID-6 and carry around 5 external USB drives to move your data between locations? It’s just so convenient. 🤣

      Seriously, I don’t get the raid comments at all.

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol this place is half a circle jerk of people who think they’re certified geniuses for rejecting mainstream technology, tech hipsters. There was a thread about Google’s “safe browsing” thing and most of the comments were just "iMaGiNe UsInG gOoGle!!*

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My only counter argument is that the verge article should also have stuck to the failures/defect, and either not mentioned their own dataloss, or at least mention possible mitigation strategies. I understand not everyone can do proper backups, but the verge can, and they should lead by example.

      As for a comment on the actual drive defect, this is probably one of those cases where you want to insist on a refund. If the problem is as widespread as claimed, then getting a new defective drive doesn’t really help. WD/sandisk should just be recalling and refunding all devices. It’s odd that tech stuff never seems to have recalls in the same way that cars do? They seem to just rely on individual RMAs.

      • XTornado@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aren’t usually recalls mostly for cases where it would cause personal injuries and as such the damages to the company are far bigger than not doing the recall.

        • CameronDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah it’s probably a risk/damages calculation. But imagine if WD had simply recalled all affected devices. Might mitigate some of the PR damage?

    • rambos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is your comment with so many upvotes but I still had to scroll down to find it. Everything above is kinda morbid. Im glad I scrolled enough, was worried a bit 🤣

    • hypelightfly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you read the article? Because as far as I can see it fails to actually say shit about the problem. From just this article I can see why people are blaming the author for not having redundancy.

      The Arstechnica articles however do actually say what’s going on, so yeah this appears to be a real issue with these drives disconnecting.

    • Selmafudd@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      But never miss an opportunity to pleasure yourself in public I guess?

      I mean I wasn’t really in the mood but I’ll rub one out just for you

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      48
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      irrelevant to the point of the article

      What are you talking about? Of course it’s relevant.

      Hard drives are unreliable, they always have been and they probably always will be.

      I’ve personally had three drives fail in the last 12 months - two HDDs and one SSD. And both of those were internal hard drives either in a data center or at least on a desk in a properly climate controlled office. All three of them were from far more reputable manufacturers than WD. I suspect none of those failures were the actual disk by the way pretty sure they were all chipset or firmware failures.

      Your solution doesn’t have to be RAID, but it has to be something better than “I’ll just keep this file on a single drive”.

      WD should absolutely do better - but at the same time even if they did do better it still wouldn’t be good enough. There shouldn’t be any data loss when (not if) a drive fails.

        • PupBiru@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          there are 2 discussions happening: 1 about the product the article is talking about, and another about the tangentially related topic of disk failure in general

          i see no problem here… or are we only allowed to discuss the specific points the article mentions now and absolutely under no circumstances are we allowed to have discussions about anything else…?

        • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Second paragraph of the article: “My colleague Vjeran just lost 3TB of video”.

          It’s not just the title, the entire article is about data loss. To be honest what really bothers me about the article is the whole thing points fingers at WD for making a mistake, while conveniently ignoring that fact that a Verge employee also made a mistake and I’d argue a worse one by failing to backup their data.

          If the article was about “it’s annoying to have to wait for a replacement drive to be sent” then I’d be right on board. But that’s not what the article is about.

          • phillaholic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No… the company trying to hide the fact that their product is defective is the point here. Lost data or not, people are paying for a product that’s defective. End of story.

    • Maximilious@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      47
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then the article title should be less click bait termed and properly address that there’s a major firmware fault in the drives.

      Journalism is lost on generating clicks and user turmoil rather than servicing the public in any way.